2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the iron–nitrogen phase diagram at high pressure and high temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 17 ] Afterward, cubic FeN was prepared by DC reactive sputtering, [ 18 ] which encouraged more researchers to search for Fe–N compounds with higher nitrogen content. A combination of density functional theory computations and thermodynamic calculations was provided to study the iron–nitrogen system for pressures up to 200 GPa and temperatures up to 4000 K. [ 19 ] Wessel et al [ 20 ] used a series of density‐functional electronic‐structure calculations and determined a cubic FeN 2 phase with bulk modulus of 192 GPa and magnetic moment of 1.68μ B per iron. Gupta et al [ 21 ] made a detailed analysis of the phonon dispersion curves to confirm the dynamical stability of cubic FeN 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 17 ] Afterward, cubic FeN was prepared by DC reactive sputtering, [ 18 ] which encouraged more researchers to search for Fe–N compounds with higher nitrogen content. A combination of density functional theory computations and thermodynamic calculations was provided to study the iron–nitrogen system for pressures up to 200 GPa and temperatures up to 4000 K. [ 19 ] Wessel et al [ 20 ] used a series of density‐functional electronic‐structure calculations and determined a cubic FeN 2 phase with bulk modulus of 192 GPa and magnetic moment of 1.68μ B per iron. Gupta et al [ 21 ] made a detailed analysis of the phonon dispersion curves to confirm the dynamical stability of cubic FeN 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%