1991
DOI: 10.1080/03081089108818048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the generic jordan canonical form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weyr's Theorem [30] says that the two nilpotent matrices Ò P and C P have the same Jordan invariants if and only if rank C (Ò k P ) = rank C (C k P ) for every k. So, it is interesting to test for which ℓ we have rank(Ò k P ) = rank(C k P ) for every k ≤ ℓ. We refer to [2,3,4,11,13,19,23,25,26,27,29] for some work on Jordan canonical forms determined by combinatorial patterns and refer to [12,22] for some work on ranks of matrix powers determined by combinatorial patterns. …”
Section: Y Wu and S Zhaomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weyr's Theorem [30] says that the two nilpotent matrices Ò P and C P have the same Jordan invariants if and only if rank C (Ò k P ) = rank C (C k P ) for every k. So, it is interesting to test for which ℓ we have rank(Ò k P ) = rank(C k P ) for every k ≤ ℓ. We refer to [2,3,4,11,13,19,23,25,26,27,29] for some work on Jordan canonical forms determined by combinatorial patterns and refer to [12,22] for some work on ranks of matrix powers determined by combinatorial patterns. …”
Section: Y Wu and S Zhaomentioning
confidence: 99%