1996
DOI: 10.1007/s002110050175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the generalized singular values/vectors of large sparse or structured matrix pairs

Abstract: We present a numerical algorithm for computing a few extreme generalized singular values and corresponding vectors of a sparse or structured matrix pair {A, B }. The algorithm is based on the CS decomposition and the Lanczos bidiagonalization process. At each iteration step of the Lanczos process, the solution to a linear least squares problem with (A T , B T ) T as the coefficient matrix is approximately computed, and this consists the only interface of the algorithm with the matrix pair {A, B }. Numerical re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we consider real-valued operators, then (from Remark 4) we seek the maximum generalized singular value of {Ψ − Φ k , I − Ψ} and {Ψ − Φ k , I + Ψ}. For sparse matrices, such as those that arise with explicit time stepping of differential discretizations, iterative methods have been developed to compute these values and vectors for relatively cheap and without forming (I − Ψ) −1 (for example, see [45]). Even if Φ and Ψ are implicit and thus contain inverses, iterative methods to compute the largest generalized singular value are typically applicable if the action of Φ and Ψ are available.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we consider real-valued operators, then (from Remark 4) we seek the maximum generalized singular value of {Ψ − Φ k , I − Ψ} and {Ψ − Φ k , I + Ψ}. For sparse matrices, such as those that arise with explicit time stepping of differential discretizations, iterative methods have been developed to compute these values and vectors for relatively cheap and without forming (I − Ψ) −1 (for example, see [45]). Even if Φ and Ψ are implicit and thus contain inverses, iterative methods to compute the largest generalized singular value are typically applicable if the action of Φ and Ψ are available.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is similar to that of Lemma 2 and hence is omitted here. 21 = I , as shown in Lemma 2/ Lemma 3. Now we explain how the matrixˆsA or Aˆs, in which ∈ R n×n , s ∈ {±1}, and is nonsingular ifŝ = −1, can be reduced to the form…”
Section: Lemma 3 Given Matricesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The purpose of this section is to show how the matrix A can be reduced to the form Q (1) 21 = I , by performing at most m QR-factorizations. Section 2.1 explains how the problem can be solved for a sequence of 2 or 3 matrices.…”
Section: Qr-type Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations