2016
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4063-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the effective action with the functional renormalization group

Abstract: The "exact" or "functional" renormalization group equation describes the renormalization group flow of the effective average action k . The ordinary effective action 0 can be obtained by integrating the flow equation from an ultraviolet scale k = down to k = 0. We give several examples of such calculations at one-loop, both in renormalizable and in effective field theories. We reproduce the four-point scattering amplitude in the case of a real scalar field theory with quartic potential and in the case of the p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The form factor may be used only as a way to interpolate between infrared (IR) and UV behavior of the theory in a covariant way. Such ideas are similar to the ideas of the smooth covariant cutoff developed in the field of functional RG [11][12][13][14][15][16]. We believe that the true significance of the form factors used in nonlocal theories will be revealed only at the loop level.…”
Section: Jhep08(2015)038mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The form factor may be used only as a way to interpolate between infrared (IR) and UV behavior of the theory in a covariant way. Such ideas are similar to the ideas of the smooth covariant cutoff developed in the field of functional RG [11][12][13][14][15][16]. We believe that the true significance of the form factors used in nonlocal theories will be revealed only at the loop level.…”
Section: Jhep08(2015)038mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…in which ∆ = −∂ 2 x is the Laplacian operator in flat space and F µν = ∂ µ A ν − ∂ ν A µ is the Abelian curvature tensor [37]. It should be clear that the non-local form-factor appearing between the two copies of F µν is a covariant way of writing (1) in which the momentum scale q 2 comes from Fourier transformation of the differential operator ∆.…”
Section: Mass-dependent Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the aim of this paper it is relevant that there is no renormalization of the Newton constant (β G N = 0). For the case of Minkowski signature, one more reason to use DR is that the cut-off regularization scheme is not naively Lorentz invariant (see however [65] for a different point of view). As we noticed above, the cancellation of some beta functions is actually automatically valid for perturbations of gravity around a background that is a classical solution of (9) (in particular a Ricci-flat one).…”
Section: Divergences In Dimensional Regularization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statistical interpretation is quite natural in the case of physical regulators, like cut-off by a UV scale e.g., but when gravity is involved, covariant regulators, such as Pauli-Villars [65,71] and the heat kernel regularization, should be preferred and there is no obvious way of carrying out such a counting. This has led to attempts to distinguish statistical and conical definitions of entropy, arguing that the latter is marred by such unphysical features as not being positive definite and being gauge-and regulator-dependent [8].…”
Section: Conical Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%