2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the distribution of quadratic forms: Further comparisons between the Liu–Tang–Zhang approximation and exact methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
134
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
134
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CMB observations, for example, are constraining flat ΛCDM to a precision where posteriors are well approximated by Gaussian distributions. Whenever updating or comparing CMB con-120.6 (25). The contours cover 68% and 95% of the overall posterior volume and the dotted lines show the means.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMB observations, for example, are constraining flat ΛCDM to a precision where posteriors are well approximated by Gaussian distributions. Whenever updating or comparing CMB con-120.6 (25). The contours cover 68% and 95% of the overall posterior volume and the dotted lines show the means.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a similar, more general approach, see [10]. For alternative approaches, see [11]. Unlike these alternatives, the approach of the present section has an upper bound on its required number of floating-point operations that depends only on the number n of bins and on the precision ε of computations, not on the values of σ 1 , σ 2 , .…”
Section: The Sum Of the Squares Of Independent Centered Gaussian Randmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9) and the scope of this paper. Duchesne and De Micheaux (2010) have compared the properties of several approximation approaches to problem (11) with "exact" methods that can bound the approximation error and make it arbitrarily small. All methods are implemented in C language and interfaced to R in the package CompQuadForm.…”
Section: Conclusion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%