2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11786-016-0248-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the Canonical Representation of Constructible Sets

Abstract: Constructible sets are needed in many algorithms of Computer Algebra, particularly in the Gröbner 1 Cover and other algorithms for parametric polynomial systems. In this paper we review the canonical form of 2 constructible sets and give algorithms for computing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in [16], the proposed methods allow one to determine the actual values of the parameters that lead to a loss of the reachability, observability, controllability, constructibility, stabilisability, and detectability properties for parametric (discrete‐time and continuous‐time) systems. The drawback of this more detailed analysis is an increased computational complexity since determining Gröbner covers is more computationally demanding than using the graph‐theoretical techniques given in [16] (see [18–21] for details on the computational complexity of Gröbner covers), which makes the techniques given in this paper not practically applicable to large or networked systems having hundreds of state variables. However, algorithms for algebraic geometry computations are continuously improving, so that it will be possible in the future to solve problems that are today intractable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in [16], the proposed methods allow one to determine the actual values of the parameters that lead to a loss of the reachability, observability, controllability, constructibility, stabilisability, and detectability properties for parametric (discrete‐time and continuous‐time) systems. The drawback of this more detailed analysis is an increased computational complexity since determining Gröbner covers is more computationally demanding than using the graph‐theoretical techniques given in [16] (see [18–21] for details on the computational complexity of Gröbner covers), which makes the techniques given in this paper not practically applicable to large or networked systems having hundreds of state variables. However, algorithms for algebraic geometry computations are continuously improving, so that it will be possible in the future to solve problems that are today intractable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, each pair false(Ai,Gifalse), i=1,,ζ, of a Gröbner cover of a parametric ideal scriptI is referred to as a branch of the Gröbner cover, and is constituted by a segment Ai and by a (not necessarily reduced) Gröbner basis Gi of the parametric ideal along that segment. See [18–21] for algorithms capable of computing Gröbner covers of parametric polynomial ideals; these algorithms are implemented in the grobcov library of the software Singular [22], an open source computer algebra system, which is used hereafter to carry out all the computations in the examples given in the following, including the computation of the reduced Gröbner basis; the GRL order is always used in all these examples, just for reducing the computation times [17].…”
Section: Algebraic Geometry Notionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume access to algorithms that 1. compute unions and intersections of constructible sets, and 2. determine whether a constructible set is empty. See [BM16], for example.…”
Section: Algorithms For Families Of Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%