2015
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2015012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing quantities of interest for random domains with second order shape sensitivity analysis

Abstract: We consider random perturbations of a given domain. The characteristic amplitude of these perturbations is assumed to be small. We are interested in quantities of interest which depend on the random domain through a boundary value problem. We derive asymptotic expansions of the first moments of the distribution of this output function. A simple and efficient method is proposed to compute the coefficients of these expansions provided that the random perturbation admits a low-rank spectral representation. By num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lends to the notion of a stochastic geometric family which can be used to quantify the impact of tolerances on engineering designs, namely how geometric uncertainties in design propagate through the solution manifold. Similar ideas have been considered in the field of shape uncertainty quantification, on the analysis of random domains, such as those presented in [29,15,22]. Additionally, tools such as compressed sensing shows promise in obtaining coefficients to high-order modes, and consequently an increase in surrogate model fidelity, without incurring additional sampling expense in solution fields which are inherently sparse [20,28].…”
Section: Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This lends to the notion of a stochastic geometric family which can be used to quantify the impact of tolerances on engineering designs, namely how geometric uncertainties in design propagate through the solution manifold. Similar ideas have been considered in the field of shape uncertainty quantification, on the analysis of random domains, such as those presented in [29,15,22]. Additionally, tools such as compressed sensing shows promise in obtaining coefficients to high-order modes, and consequently an increase in surrogate model fidelity, without incurring additional sampling expense in solution fields which are inherently sparse [20,28].…”
Section: Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this section, we shall provide a means to compute the solution u 0 to the boundary value problem (5) and the associated local shape derivatives δu 0 [ϕ] and δ 2 u 0 [ϕ] given by (6) and 7, respectively. Since we only deal with boundary perturbations here, a natural approach is based on a boundary integral formulation, which circumvents the discretization of the entire domain.…”
Section: Boundary Integral Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that similar approach for scalar output functionals of partial differential equations on uncertain domains has already been considered in [6]. Such shape functionals can be linearized by means of shape calculus, which, in particular, involves the computation of the shape Hessian of the functional under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perturbation method starts with a prescribed perturbation field at the boundary of a reference configuration and uses a shape Taylor expansion with respect to this perturbation field to represent the solution [19]. In [1,12] a similar technique was used to incorporate random perturbations of a given domain in the context of shape optimization. Moreover, the fictitious domain approach and a polynomial chaos expansion have been applied in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%