2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/qomex.2019.8743303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing Quality-of-Experience Ranges for Video Quality Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, however, several papers appeared in the literature underlining the limits of the MOS as a comprehensive measure of QoE while proposing more complete approaches for an effective objective evaluation of the perceptual quality as assessed by the end users [20,21,22,23]. In [24], the authors argued that for a given objective quality score, the corresponding subjective quality should be considered a probability distribution. In other words, the MOS, being a single value, does not capture all the aspects that contribute to measuring QoE.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, several papers appeared in the literature underlining the limits of the MOS as a comprehensive measure of QoE while proposing more complete approaches for an effective objective evaluation of the perceptual quality as assessed by the end users [20,21,22,23]. In [24], the authors argued that for a given objective quality score, the corresponding subjective quality should be considered a probability distribution. In other words, the MOS, being a single value, does not capture all the aspects that contribute to measuring QoE.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in a number of recent papers, relying on statistical methods, authors highlighted the inability of the MOS to fully capture all the aspects necessary to measure the perceived quality of a media. In [6], the deviation from the MOS is handled by determining ranges of quality of experience (QoE) rather than a single MOS value. The authors in [24] illustrated the fundamental advantages of using the distribution of opinion scores to assess the quality rather than the MOS, thus underlining the importance of explicitly taking into account the opinions' diversity when assessing the perceived visual quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%