2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing personalized brain functional networks from fMRI using self-supervised deep learning

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tractography projection [35] Only used for dMRI data, relying on reference atlas to offer seed brain regions for tractography between cortical and subcortical areas Figure 1: tractography projection Decomposition [36,37] Mostly used for fMRI data, utilizing a group of subjects to build the grouplevel reference components and then projecting it onto individual subjects Figure 1: decomposition Exemplar-based clustering [38,39] Mostly used for fMRI data, utilizing a group of subjects to build the group-level exemplar map and then performing af nity propagation clustering for individuals Boundary iterative adjustment [40,41] Not limited to data modalities, utilizing a group of subjects to build a reference probability atlas and then iteratively adjusting the region boundary in individuals until convergence Probabilistic modeling [42,43] Mostly used for fMRI data, utilizing a group of subjects to optimize inter-subject, intra-subject, and inter-region variability and to build the individual atlas Deep learning [44,45] Not limited to data modalities, utilizing a group of subjects to train an individualized brain mapping model and then predicting the parcellation pattern for individuals points simultaneously. Thus, the parcellation granularity of the region growing method is determined by the number of seed points.…”
Section: Group Prior-guided Individualized Brain Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tractography projection [35] Only used for dMRI data, relying on reference atlas to offer seed brain regions for tractography between cortical and subcortical areas Figure 1: tractography projection Decomposition [36,37] Mostly used for fMRI data, utilizing a group of subjects to build the grouplevel reference components and then projecting it onto individual subjects Figure 1: decomposition Exemplar-based clustering [38,39] Mostly used for fMRI data, utilizing a group of subjects to build the group-level exemplar map and then performing af nity propagation clustering for individuals Boundary iterative adjustment [40,41] Not limited to data modalities, utilizing a group of subjects to build a reference probability atlas and then iteratively adjusting the region boundary in individuals until convergence Probabilistic modeling [42,43] Mostly used for fMRI data, utilizing a group of subjects to optimize inter-subject, intra-subject, and inter-region variability and to build the individual atlas Deep learning [44,45] Not limited to data modalities, utilizing a group of subjects to train an individualized brain mapping model and then predicting the parcellation pattern for individuals points simultaneously. Thus, the parcellation granularity of the region growing method is determined by the number of seed points.…”
Section: Group Prior-guided Individualized Brain Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37] More recently, an autoencoder model has been employed to extract group-level components in a non-linear manner, providing an individualized brain atlas with exible parcellation granularities. [45] Exemplar-based clustering builds upon traditional individual clustering while incorporating prior information from reference atlases [Figure 1, Table 1]. Researchers have used unsupervised learning-based individual clustering methods to construct an individualized brain atlas based on data from a speci c subject; however, this approach may produce an individualized brain atlas that is sensitive to initial centroids and cluster numbers.…”
Section: Group Prior-guided Individualized Brain Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, current approaches to individualized brain parcellation can be broadly categorized into three classes: group atlas registration (GAreg; Evans et al, 2012), unsupervised learning-based parcellation (Eickhoff et al, 2018), and prior-guided parcellation (PG-par;Cui et al, 2020;Kong et al, 2019;Li et al, 2023;Ma et al, 2022;Salehi et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2015). GA-reg methods assume that different In this study, we introduce a prior-guided individualized thalamic parcellation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this approach can incorporate similarity of views into the learning algorithm, it cannot reveal the shared structure across views. This may be important in certain applications such as network neuroscience, where both the subject level connectomes as well as a group connectome that summarizes what is common across subjects for a given task are essential to identify individual variation [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%