2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2018)031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing N -subjettiness for boosted jets

Abstract: Jet substructure tools have proven useful in a number of high-energy particle-physics studies. A particular case is the discrimination, or tagging, between a boosted jet originated from an electroweak boson (signal), and a standard QCD parton (background). A common way to achieve this is to cut on a measure of the radiation inside the jet, i.e. a jet shape. Over the last few years, analytic calculations of jet substructure have allowed for a deeper understanding of these tools and for the development of more e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we focus on the soft drop grooming algorithm of [4]. Both on the experimental [5][6][7][8] and the theoretical side [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], significant progress has been made recently in improving our understanding of soft drop groomed jet observables. In the heavy-ion community, soft drop groomed jet substructure observables have also received increasing attention from both experiment [25][26][27][28] and theory [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we focus on the soft drop grooming algorithm of [4]. Both on the experimental [5][6][7][8] and the theoretical side [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], significant progress has been made recently in improving our understanding of soft drop groomed jet observables. In the heavy-ion community, soft drop groomed jet substructure observables have also received increasing attention from both experiment [25][26][27][28] and theory [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When D ∼ C 2 , emissions that set the D-parameter therefore also set the event plane, and this backreaction is responsible for the D-parameter to lose additivity and prohibit any standard factorization. Related issues with factorization breakdown in endpoint regions of phase space have also been observed in studies of observables sensitive to multi-prong jet substructure [39,44,60]. Nevertheless, this does not imply that factorization is impossible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…N -subjettiness distributions can be meaningfully calculated in perturbative QCD. These distributions have been the subject of several theoretical investigations [29,30,53] (see also [34,54,55] for theoretical studies on the related observable D 2 ). The N -subjettiness distributions were calculated explicitly at LL accuracy, i.e.…”
Section: Jhep09(2020)195mentioning
confidence: 99%