Abstract:Abstract-For fixed compact connected Lie groups H ⊆ G, we provide a polynomial time algorithm to compute the multiplicity of a given irreducible representation of H in the restriction of an irreducible representation of G. Our algorithm is based on a finite difference formula which makes the multiplicities amenable to Barvinok's algorithm for counting integral points in polytopes.The Kronecker coefficients of the symmetric group, which can be seen to be a special case of such multiplicities, play an important … Show more
“…With Valiant's theory of determinant computations as its starting point, their approach relies, among other things, on the (conjectural) ability to decide in polynomial time the positivity of Kronecker coefficients and their plethystic generalizations. Envisioned as a far reaching mathematical program requiring over 100 years to complete [F2], this approach led to a flurry of activity in an attempt to understand and establish some critical combinatorial and computational properties of Kronecker coefficients (see [BOR1,BI1,CDW,Ike,M1]). This paper is a new advance in this direction.…”
Abstract. We study the complexity of computing Kronecker coefficients g(λ, µ, ν). We give explicit bounds in terms of the number of parts ℓ in the partitions, their largest part size N and the smallest second part M of the three partitions. When M = O(1), i.e. one of the partitions is hook-like, the bounds are linear in log N , but depend exponentially on ℓ. Moreover, similar bounds hold even when M = e O(ℓ) . By a separate argument, we show that the positivity of Kronecker coefficients can be decided in O(log N ) time for a bounded number ℓ of parts and without restriction on M . Related problems of computing Kronecker coefficients when one partition is a hook, and computing characters of Sn are also considered.
“…With Valiant's theory of determinant computations as its starting point, their approach relies, among other things, on the (conjectural) ability to decide in polynomial time the positivity of Kronecker coefficients and their plethystic generalizations. Envisioned as a far reaching mathematical program requiring over 100 years to complete [F2], this approach led to a flurry of activity in an attempt to understand and establish some critical combinatorial and computational properties of Kronecker coefficients (see [BOR1,BI1,CDW,Ike,M1]). This paper is a new advance in this direction.…”
Abstract. We study the complexity of computing Kronecker coefficients g(λ, µ, ν). We give explicit bounds in terms of the number of parts ℓ in the partitions, their largest part size N and the smallest second part M of the three partitions. When M = O(1), i.e. one of the partitions is hook-like, the bounds are linear in log N , but depend exponentially on ℓ. Moreover, similar bounds hold even when M = e O(ℓ) . By a separate argument, we show that the positivity of Kronecker coefficients can be decided in O(log N ) time for a bounded number ℓ of parts and without restriction on M . Related problems of computing Kronecker coefficients when one partition is a hook, and computing characters of Sn are also considered.
“…When the stabilizer of λ in the Weyl group of G is large, we explain how to take advantage of this situation. Similarly as in [11,10], our method for computing g(kλ 1 , kλ 2 , . .…”
Abstract. The computation of Kronecker coefficients is a challenging problem with a variety of applications. In this paper we present an approach based on methods from symplectic geometry and residue calculus. We outline a general algorithm for the problem and then illustrate its effectiveness in several interesting examples. Significantly, our algorithm does not only compute individual Kronecker coefficients, but also symbolic formulas that are valid on an entire polyhedral chamber. As a byproduct, we are able to compute several Hilbert series.
“…Algorithms for computing Kronecker coefficients have been implemented in for example Schur [26], Sage [20] and the Python package Kronecker [6].…”
Section: Highest-weight Vector Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will apply the method described above to the tensor 2, 2, 2 q , see Theorem 2. [5,14,8,2,12,0,1,15,6,11,18,13,4,3,9,17,7,10,16,19], [14,5,9,0,6,13,16,15,4,11,3,10,12,8,2,17,7,19,18,1]), 18,2,12,10,5,1,17,19,9,3,4,7,6,…”
Section: The Matrix Multiplication Tensormentioning
We show that the border support rank of the tensor corresponding to two-bytwo matrix multiplication is seven over the complex numbers. We do this by constructing two polynomials that vanish on all complex tensors with format four-by-four-by-four and border rank at most six, but that do not vanish simultaneously on any tensor with the same support as the two-by-two matrix multiplication tensor. This extends the work of Hauenstein, Ikenmeyer, and Landsberg. We also give two proofs that the support rank of the two-by-two matrix multiplication tensor is seven over any field: one proof using a result of De Groote saying that the decomposition of this tensor is unique up to sandwiching, and another proof via the substitution method. These results answer a question asked by Cohn and Umans. Studying the border support rank of the matrix multiplication tensor is relevant for the design of matrix multiplication algorithms, because upper bounds on the border support rank of the matrix multiplication tensor lead to upper bounds on the computational complexity of matrix multiplication, via a construction of Cohn and Umans. Moreover, support rank may be interpreted as a quantum communication complexity measure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.