2018
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/aac197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing local sensitivity and tolerances for stellarator physics properties using shape gradients

Abstract: Tight tolerances have been a leading driver of cost in recent stellarator experiments, so improved definition and control of tolerances can have significant impact on progress in the field. Here we relate tolerances to the shape gradient representation that has been useful for shape optimization in industry, used for example to determine which regions of a car or aerofoil most affect drag, and we demonstrate how the shape gradient can be computed for physics properties of toroidal plasmas. The shape gradient g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to optimize without being confined to a winding surface is a new capability within FOCUS that was not available for the coil sets designed for HSX and W7-X. Previous results showed that areas of low sensitivity can be calculated for stellarator equilibria using shape gradients (Landreman & Paul 2018). Fortuitously, these regions of low sensitivity are also the areas were divertor heat fluxes tend to exit the plasma (Bader et al 2017), allowing for the construction of a non-resonant divertor as described in § 4.4.…”
Section: Coil Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to optimize without being confined to a winding surface is a new capability within FOCUS that was not available for the coil sets designed for HSX and W7-X. Previous results showed that areas of low sensitivity can be calculated for stellarator equilibria using shape gradients (Landreman & Paul 2018). Fortuitously, these regions of low sensitivity are also the areas were divertor heat fluxes tend to exit the plasma (Bader et al 2017), allowing for the construction of a non-resonant divertor as described in § 4.4.…”
Section: Coil Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function is defined on a flux surface, ; thus it is sensible to express in the following way, Here describes the local perturbation to the field strength, and quantifies the corresponding change to the moment . The function is analogous to the shape gradient, which quantifies the change in a figure of merit which results from a differential perturbation to a shape (Landreman & Paul 2018). The shape gradient will be discussed further in § 5.2.2.…”
Section: Applications Of the Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, can inform where perturbations to the magnetic field strength can be tolerated. The sensitivity function could be related directly to a local magnetic tolerance using the method described in section 9 of Landreman & Paul (2018). In contrast with that work, here we are considering perturbations to the field strength on any flux surface rather than at the plasma boundary.…”
Section: Applications Of the Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ω = {R c mn , Z s mn } could be assumed, where these are the Fourier coefficients in a cosine and sine representation of the cylindrical coordinates (R, Z) of S P . Upon discretization of the right-hand side on a surface, the above takes the form of a linear system that can be solved for G (Landreman & Paul 2018). However, this approach requires performing at least one additional equilibrium calculation for each parameter with a finite-difference approach.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%