2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing intracoronary blood flow rate under incomplete boundary conditions: Combing coronary anatomy and fractional flow reserve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QFR and OFR are both techniques based on blood flow simulation, which require assumptions such as vessel wall thickness, blood viscosity, vessel elasticity and other parameters, which may vary greatly in different patients and different vessels, thus affecting the calculated results of FFR. On the contrary, some studies have also shown that the model assumptions of QFR and OFR do not affect their adaptability, as long as the corresponding blood flow parameters and boundary conditions are adjusted according to different blood flow conditions and vessel characteristics, accurate results can be obtained [ 43 ]. Finally, in terms of consistency, all four techniques are good, with a high degree of automation, stable and repeatable results [ 44 , 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussion: Comprehensive Evaluation Of Computational Hemody...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QFR and OFR are both techniques based on blood flow simulation, which require assumptions such as vessel wall thickness, blood viscosity, vessel elasticity and other parameters, which may vary greatly in different patients and different vessels, thus affecting the calculated results of FFR. On the contrary, some studies have also shown that the model assumptions of QFR and OFR do not affect their adaptability, as long as the corresponding blood flow parameters and boundary conditions are adjusted according to different blood flow conditions and vessel characteristics, accurate results can be obtained [ 43 ]. Finally, in terms of consistency, all four techniques are good, with a high degree of automation, stable and repeatable results [ 44 , 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussion: Comprehensive Evaluation Of Computational Hemody...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 where P a is the mean proximal pressure, P d is the mean distal pressure, Q is the absolute mean ow rate, VF and EL are ow resistance parameters of epicardial coronary artery, namely viscous friction (VF) and expansion loss (EL). These two ow resistance parameters (VF and EL) are mainly determined by the anatomy of epicardial coronary artery, and can be obtained by a CFD-based pressure-ow curve method from the reconstructed 3D anatomy model, which was proposed by our group previously [15,18]. Then, with the measured P a and P d during routine FFR measurement, the corresponding Q can be calculated through Eq.…”
Section: Cfd Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, routine FFR measurement only records the distal pressure at target vessel, resulting that the side branches are ignored in the CFD model (lacking of boundary conditions to include side branches). This simpli cation has great impact on the computed ow rate [15]. To overcome this limitation, our group proposed a novel CFD method which implicitly specifying constraints for splitting ow between branches within a pressure-ow curve based ow resistance model [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation