1958
DOI: 10.1137/0106010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing Eigenvalues of Non-Hermitian Matrices by Methods of Jacobi Type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we will focus on a particular cyclic Jacobi-like algorithm for the computation of the Schur form of a complex matrix. The basic idea of the algorithm is a direct adaption of Jacobi's method to the nonsymmetric case which has been proposed 1955 by Greenstadt [13] and has later been taken up and modified by various authors [4,10,14,19,24,32]. Given a matrix M = (m ij ) ∈ C n×n , the algorithm selects in each step a pivot element m kl , k < l in the strict lower triangular part.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we will focus on a particular cyclic Jacobi-like algorithm for the computation of the Schur form of a complex matrix. The basic idea of the algorithm is a direct adaption of Jacobi's method to the nonsymmetric case which has been proposed 1955 by Greenstadt [13] and has later been taken up and modified by various authors [4,10,14,19,24,32]. Given a matrix M = (m ij ) ∈ C n×n , the algorithm selects in each step a pivot element m kl , k < l in the strict lower triangular part.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more convenient to select the pairs (i,j) in some cyclic order. We here consider two cyclic orders: (i) cyclic by rows, indicated by the scheme (to, jo) -(1,2), (ik,jk + 1), if ik < n -l,jk < n, (IHr) (ik+i,jk+i) = (ik + 1, ik + 2), ii ik < n -1, jk = n, (1,2), if ik = n -l,jk = n;…”
Section: G E Forsythe and P Henricimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let A = (apf) be a real symmetric matrix of order «, and let Xi, Xa, • • • , X" be its eigenvalues. It is well known that if U is an orthogonal matrix such that (1) A = UA UT is diagonal (T denotes the transpose), then the main diagonal of A is made up of the numbers X< in some order. If it is desired to compute the Xj numerically, this result is of no immediate use, since for w>2 there exists no manageable expression for the general orthogonal matrix of order n. However, Jacobi [6] suggested the computation of the set of X,-as the limiting set of diagonal elements of a sequence of matrices which are generated from A recursively by plane rotations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again let us consider matrix A as defined by (13), now subject to the following conditions: has been mentioned as one which defies direct treatment by Greenstadt's method [2], as well as by the method of reference [1]. However, it is stated in [3] that by applying a transformation to B which effects a rotation through 8 = 7r/4, the transformed matrix becomes tractable by Greenstadt's method, and that in twelve cyclically executed annihilations of the respective pivot the matrix B becomes triangularized to a sufficient degree of accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are symmetric matrices whose elements are [Vol. XVII,No. 3 a,-,-= (i + j -l)1, i, j = 1, 2, 3, • ■ • .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%