2011
DOI: 10.1166/mex.2011.1027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing C1<I>s</I> X-ray Absorption for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Distinct Electronic Type

Abstract: The experimental data recorded for the C1s edge in X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) for graphite, graphene and nanotubes, have consistently exhibited certain discrepancies when compared with theoretical calculations. A theoretical approach to estimate the energy scale normalization for the C1s shape in X-ray absorption is presented within the time dependent density functional theory and random phase approximation framework employing the loss function. The position of the σ resonance is fairly localized wher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(13). As we have previously shown, 33 the dependence of the excitation intensity and frequency on the propagation direction Q/Q is negligible. Therefore, it is appropriate to calculate the average value of …”
Section: Energy Loss Of a Blinking Point Charge Close To The Grasupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(13). As we have previously shown, 33 the dependence of the excitation intensity and frequency on the propagation direction Q/Q is negligible. Therefore, it is appropriate to calculate the average value of …”
Section: Energy Loss Of a Blinking Point Charge Close To The Grasupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Also we can see the splitting of the π plasmon for higher wave vectors, starting from Q ≈ 0.2 a.u., which is a consequence of π -plasmon dispersion anisotropy. Namely, as shown before, 33 the π plasmon splits only if it propagates in the -M direction, so here the splitting is a consequence of calculating the average value over high-symmetry directions. At higher frequencies, at about 14 eV at the point, we can see a very broad π + σ plasmon.…”
Section: Energy Loss Of a Blinking Point Charge Close To The Gramentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For example, the π plasmon dispersion in graphene and carbon nanotubes splits if Q is in the → M direction but does not split if it is in the → K direction. [37][38][39] This means we should average Q over the high symmetry directions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31. A comparison between the experimental 14 and the theoretical spectrum obtained from expression (19) is shown in Fig.…”
Section: -5mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The disadvantage of this method is that the calculation of the interacting electron response function χ of an isolated supercell is not straightforward because of the interaction between the supercells. Because of that, it is necessary to minimize or avoid the interaction between the supercells, e.g., by using a truncated bare Coulomb propagator, 30 or by using a "zero padding" method, 31 or simply by using a very large unit cell parameter L in the z direction. On the other hand, the supercell method has an advantage that the calculation can be carried out entirely in the reciprocal space.…”
Section: B Response Function Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%