Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice 2000
DOI: 10.4135/9781446218891.n2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computers as Communication: The Rise of Digital Democracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars who study the community level impact frequently conclude that the Internet tends to mobilize already engaged people (Agre, 2002;Norris, 2001;Rogers & Malhotra, 2000), while other scholars argue that activities on the Internet are most often apolitical, but that the Internet has great populist potential (Thompson, 2000). Scholars of digital participation argue that democratic participation should be defined more broadly than the limited political praxis of elections, by including areas where ordinary people participate normally by posting comments, suggestions, and discussions (Dahlgren, 2005;Hamelink, 2000;Olsson, 2006;Pajnik, 2005;Poster, 2001;Wiklund, 2005).…”
Section: Populist Potential Of Internet Forums: Filtering Moderatingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Scholars who study the community level impact frequently conclude that the Internet tends to mobilize already engaged people (Agre, 2002;Norris, 2001;Rogers & Malhotra, 2000), while other scholars argue that activities on the Internet are most often apolitical, but that the Internet has great populist potential (Thompson, 2000). Scholars of digital participation argue that democratic participation should be defined more broadly than the limited political praxis of elections, by including areas where ordinary people participate normally by posting comments, suggestions, and discussions (Dahlgren, 2005;Hamelink, 2000;Olsson, 2006;Pajnik, 2005;Poster, 2001;Wiklund, 2005).…”
Section: Populist Potential Of Internet Forums: Filtering Moderatingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The same survey shows that 72% report that the Internet has improved their lives ("Survey shows wide enthusiasm...," 1999). All statistical descriptions of the Internet as a communication innovation indicate that the Internet has now reached "critical mass," that level of adoption where the technology continues to expand with no likelihood of nonacceptance (Rogers & Malhotra, 2000). Katz and Aspden (1997) discovered that there are specific motivations for using and barriers against using the Internet.…”
Section: The Internet and Worm Wide Webmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ARPANET allowed participants in a communication system to interact across large distances at minimal cost, it was restricted to the community of ARPA-funded computer scientists who had developed it (Rogers & Malhotra, 2000). However, ARPANet was only one among the 'network of networks' that soon became known as the Internet.…”
Section: Technologies Responsible For Digital Revolution and Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for computers, their early use was limited to complex calculations and repetitive data handling tasks.. Rogers & Malhotra (2000) argued that computers could have developed in a quite different way had four of its pioneers (Vannevar Bush, J.C.R. Licklider, Robert W. Taylor and Douglas C. Engelbart) not articulated a vision that entailed computers as communication devices.…”
Section: Technologies Responsible For Digital Revolution and Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation