2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging Results

Abstract: Application of triggers on "big" EHR data may aid in identifying patients experiencing delays in diagnostic evaluation of chest imaging results suspicious for malignancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As with prior work on this topic [30,[32][33][34], we found many instances of delays where no documented plan for subsequent follow-up was detected. This suggests that providers could be missing urinalysis results that return with hematuria, even when the red blood cell count is at a high enough level to warrant additional diagnostic evaluation for cancer.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with prior work on this topic [30,[32][33][34], we found many instances of delays where no documented plan for subsequent follow-up was detected. This suggests that providers could be missing urinalysis results that return with hematuria, even when the red blood cell count is at a high enough level to warrant additional diagnostic evaluation for cancer.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…We previously evaluated triggers to identify delays in colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer and achieved predictive values useful in clinical practice [30,[32][33][34]. In this study, we expand on this work by developing and testing a trigger algorithm to detect delays in diagnostic evaluation of a urinalysis result with hematuria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, we were similarly unable to have a second reviewer review a subset of records to confirm delays. However, inter-rater reliability for our chart review studies identifying similar types of delays has been quite high (kappas typically > 0.80), 24,35 adding confidence to our findings. Finally, data on clinical outcomes were not included or analyzed, limiting our ability to understand the clinical impact of care delays in these cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Results from the National Lung Screening Trial demonstrate that early recognition and intervention of lung cancer improves survival [13]. Institutions across the country have approached this problem by developing interventions to reduce the loss-to-follow-up rates, with varying degrees of success [3,4,[14][15][16][17]. With the expansion of the electronic health record (EHR), there are new tools to reduce the frequency of failed follow-up and potentially save lives [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%