2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/614898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized Tomography Technique for the Investigation of the Maxillary First Molar Mesiobuccal Root

Abstract: The aim of this paper was to review the literature about the use of computerized tomography to evaluate the presence and characteristics of the second mesiobuccal canal in the maxillary first molar. An electronic search was performed. Frequencies of the presence of second mesiobuccal canal and root anatomy characteristics were extracted from the selected studies. Pooled frequencies were calculated as weighted means. Seven articles were included. A second mesiobuccal canal was present in 59.32% of the teeth, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst the knowledge of the anatomy of maxillary molars is critical, CBCT may be helpful in locating MB2 in some cases. A review of the literature revealed that the MB2 canal was present in 59% of maxillary first molars using CBCT (Corbella et al 2013), which is a large discrepancy from the 86% of MB2 canals that were clinically located by the endodontic residents in this study. Another search using scanning electron microscopy showed that MB2 canals were located in 90% of maxillary first molars and 70% of maxillary second molars (Gilles & Reader 1990), which is close to the results that were obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Whilst the knowledge of the anatomy of maxillary molars is critical, CBCT may be helpful in locating MB2 in some cases. A review of the literature revealed that the MB2 canal was present in 59% of maxillary first molars using CBCT (Corbella et al 2013), which is a large discrepancy from the 86% of MB2 canals that were clinically located by the endodontic residents in this study. Another search using scanning electron microscopy showed that MB2 canals were located in 90% of maxillary first molars and 70% of maxillary second molars (Gilles & Reader 1990), which is close to the results that were obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“… 20 22 A recent systematic review has pointed to the presence of MB2 canals in 59.3% of maxillary first molars when CBCT is used for assessment. 23 Overall, the aforementioned findings from CBCT studies have presented fewer MB2 canals than results obtained from in vivo studies.…”
Section: Incidence Of Mesiolingual Canals In Mesiobuccal Rootsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…4 An inability to detect and then treat a second mesiobuccal root canal may be the main reason for endodontic failure in maxillary 1 st molar teeth. 8 The mesiobuccal root of the maxillary permanent 1 st molars is frequently treated surgically with the highest failure ratio. 9 The MB2 orifice is located DOI: 10.29309/TPMJ/2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%