1993
DOI: 10.2737/ne-rp-671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized technique for recording board defect data

Abstract: A computerized technique for recordihg board defect data has been developed that is faster and more accurate than manual techniques. The lumber database generated by this technique is necessary input to computer simulation models that estimate potential cutting yields from various lumber brt-dakdown sequences. The technique provides detailed information on the location and type of defects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this later sampling, we emphasized FAS, F1F, and Selects along with 3.5-to 5-inchwide boards in the Selects and lower grades. /3 2 75 1 2 and 3 50 3 and 4 66-2/3 1 4 and 5 50 5 to 7 66-2/3 2 6 and 7 50 8 to 10 66-2/3 3 8 and 9 50 11 to 13 66-2/3 4 10 and 11 50 14 and up 66-2/3 5 12 and 13 50 14 and up 50 3 to 10 feet surface measure will admit one 2 to 7 feet surface measure will admit one additional cutting to yield 75% clear face additional cutting to yield 66-2/3 percent clear face a From "Rules for the Measurement & Inspection of Hardwood & Cypress," 1990, National Hardwood Lumber Association, Memphis, TN. Data encoding procedures as described by Anderson et al (1993) were used to record the types (Table 3) and positions of all defects on both faces of each board. The lower left and upper right hand corners of the smallest rectangle containing each defect were recorded to an accuracy of 1/4 inch.…”
Section: Collecting and Describing Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this later sampling, we emphasized FAS, F1F, and Selects along with 3.5-to 5-inchwide boards in the Selects and lower grades. /3 2 75 1 2 and 3 50 3 and 4 66-2/3 1 4 and 5 50 5 to 7 66-2/3 2 6 and 7 50 8 to 10 66-2/3 3 8 and 9 50 11 to 13 66-2/3 4 10 and 11 50 14 and up 66-2/3 5 12 and 13 50 14 and up 50 3 to 10 feet surface measure will admit one 2 to 7 feet surface measure will admit one additional cutting to yield 75% clear face additional cutting to yield 66-2/3 percent clear face a From "Rules for the Measurement & Inspection of Hardwood & Cypress," 1990, National Hardwood Lumber Association, Memphis, TN. Data encoding procedures as described by Anderson et al (1993) were used to record the types (Table 3) and positions of all defects on both faces of each board. The lower left and upper right hand corners of the smallest rectangle containing each defect were recorded to an accuracy of 1/4 inch.…”
Section: Collecting and Describing Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if you would lay a board flat and put one side against a wall, the middle of the board would not be touching the wall. The boards were digitized according to Anderson et al [12]. Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%