1994
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.163-165.657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized Property Prediction and Process Planning in Heat Treatment of Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, present thermo-metallurgical, non-linear, transient, finite-elements models allow to perform coupled simulations of the heat conduction and of the metallurgical phase transformations [4,5]; therefore precise temperature-and phase-dependent thermophysical properties can be employed in order to seek more accurate results. 2 Because these data are seldom available for a specific steel grade, it is useful to evaluate which property is more influent upon the quench process, and therefore is worth to be more accurately assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, present thermo-metallurgical, non-linear, transient, finite-elements models allow to perform coupled simulations of the heat conduction and of the metallurgical phase transformations [4,5]; therefore precise temperature-and phase-dependent thermophysical properties can be employed in order to seek more accurate results. 2 Because these data are seldom available for a specific steel grade, it is useful to evaluate which property is more influent upon the quench process, and therefore is worth to be more accurately assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study is assumed constant emissivity (0.45) during welding simulations 3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] . The specific mass appeared in Equation 1 is assumed constant as 7700 kg.m -3 .…”
Section: Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models capable of predicting the local conditions and possibility of deleterious phases being formed are welcome and can drive good practice for avoiding the non-uniformity of properties [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] . This paper is focused on this challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods for predicting hardness distribution of quenched steel based on linear mixing rule of microstructure, carbon content, individual isothermal hardness of microstructural elements and cooling time only (Gergely et al, 1991;Fluhrer, 2005). However, one of the most important factors for predicting the hardness distribution of a quenched steel is the input data of a representative cooling characteristic that is relevant for phase transformation from austenite (parent phase) to transformed products (child phase).…”
Section: Hardness Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%