2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00153-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized processing of EEG–EOG–EMG artifacts for multi-centric studies in EEG oscillations and event-related potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
164
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
164
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The EEG epochs with ocular, muscular and other types of artifact were preliminary identified by a computerized automatic procedure (Moretti et al, 2003). Two expert electroencephalographists manually double-checked and confirmed the automatic selections.…”
Section: Eeg Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EEG epochs with ocular, muscular and other types of artifact were preliminary identified by a computerized automatic procedure (Moretti et al, 2003). Two expert electroencephalographists manually double-checked and confirmed the automatic selections.…”
Section: Eeg Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two expert electroencephalographists manually double-checked and confirmed the automatic selections. The EEG epochs contaminated by ocular artifacts were corrected by a standard autoregressive method (Moretti et al, 2003). The EEG epochs in which the ocular artifacts could not be removed with that procedure were rejected from the analysis.…”
Section: Eeg Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computerized automatic procedure was based by a software package that included automatic procedures for (i) EOG artifact detection and correction, (ii) EMG analysis, (iii) EEG artifact analysis and (iv) optimization of the ratio between artifact-free EEG channels and trials to be rejected. The reject criteria were based on a threshold method and on a statistical method evaluating the non-stationarity of the EEG signal (Moretti et al, 2003). Then, two expert electroencephalographists manually confirmed the automatic selections.…”
Section: Off-line Preliminary Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrodes with consistently poor signal quality are typically removed and then recreated using interpolation from the remaining electrodes, which effectively reduces the spatial resolution of the EEG. Therefore, several methods of removing eye and muscle movement artifacts while retaining EEG data have been proposed (Croft and Barry, 2000;Moretti et al, 2003;Schlögl et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%