1983
DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(83)90011-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized evaluation of blood flow measurement indices using doppler ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximizing the trueP¯ signal permits the assumption that the entire cross‐sectional area of the MCA is fully captured within the sample volume of the TCD's transmitted signal and that any changes in the trueP¯ signal that ensue represent a change in MCA calibre (Deverson & Evans, ). Though no in vivo validation studies have been performed, changes in the trueP¯ signal as an index of changes in cross‐sectional area of the insonated artery has been validated using flow phantoms (Deverson & Evans, ; Hatab et al., ; Saini, Maulik, Nanda, & Rosenzweig, ), which remain the gold standard for validation of non‐invasive techniques used in humans to assess CBF such as duplex ultrasonography (Rominger et al., ) and neuroimaging (Taviani et al., ). Finally, to minimize the impact of TCD probe movement on signal quality, participants were instructed to remain as still as possible during the entire experimental protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximizing the trueP¯ signal permits the assumption that the entire cross‐sectional area of the MCA is fully captured within the sample volume of the TCD's transmitted signal and that any changes in the trueP¯ signal that ensue represent a change in MCA calibre (Deverson & Evans, ). Though no in vivo validation studies have been performed, changes in the trueP¯ signal as an index of changes in cross‐sectional area of the insonated artery has been validated using flow phantoms (Deverson & Evans, ; Hatab et al., ; Saini, Maulik, Nanda, & Rosenzweig, ), which remain the gold standard for validation of non‐invasive techniques used in humans to assess CBF such as duplex ultrasonography (Rominger et al., ) and neuroimaging (Taviani et al., ). Finally, to minimize the impact of TCD probe movement on signal quality, participants were instructed to remain as still as possible during the entire experimental protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), it has been difficult to identify a single index that characterizes the "most representative" velocity. We approached this problem by building on the work of Saini et al (31), who proposed three useful Doppler spectrum indices: the maximum significant velocity VMs, the velocity of dominant energy VDE, and the mean velocity V M . To evaluate specific spectral indices, we performed an experimental PUDVM study (14) of well-prescribed steady (Poiseuille) flows in tiny straight tubes.…”
Section: Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%