2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized epileptiform transient detection in the scalp electroencephalogram: Obstacles to progress and the example of computerized ECG interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
72
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, based on the latest review proposed by Halford (2009), some comparison can be made since most algorithms also publish their results in terms of sensibility and selectivity (18 algorithms have published both). Sensitivity and selectivity of the proposed algorithm was compared to each of those and it shows a higher sensitivity in 72% (13/18) of the cases and a higher selectivity also in 72% (13/18) of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, based on the latest review proposed by Halford (2009), some comparison can be made since most algorithms also publish their results in terms of sensibility and selectivity (18 algorithms have published both). Sensitivity and selectivity of the proposed algorithm was compared to each of those and it shows a higher sensitivity in 72% (13/18) of the cases and a higher selectivity also in 72% (13/18) of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many automated spike detection algorithms have been published (as shown in Frost (1985), Wilson and Emerson (2002) and Halford (2009) for review). Algorithms are typically based on methods such as template matching (Ji et al, 2011), mimetic analysis (Exarchos et al, 2006), power spectral analysis (Sugi et al, 2002;Adjouadi et al, 2004;Exarchos et al, 2006), wavelet analysis (Adeli et al, 2003;Indiradevi et al, 2008) and artificial neural networks (Guler and Ubeyli, 2005;Tzallas et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean sensitivity and false positive rate of the proposed algorithm has been calculated for the 10 s recording window. All the algorithms listed in the most comprehensive and up-to-date review paper of spike detection algorithms published in 2009 [26], together with algorithms published since then, have been considered in order to generate Table III that the proposed method outperforms comparable previously published spike detection algorithms. However, it is worth stressing that the comparison has not taken into account all algorithms previously reported in literature, but only those that would be suitable for low power implementation since these are the ones that are relevant in the context of this work.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result there has been a large amount of research interest in the creation of automated spike detection algorithms. ) lists 70 such papers while (Halford, 2009;Harner, 2009) provide recent performance reviews. Despite this high level of interest however a definitive detection solution has not been found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%