DOI: 10.1159/000400873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized Dose Distribution Estimation System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern of implant placement was dependent on the size and shape of the tumour and the surrounding structures. Computer-assisted dosimetry calculations (Neblett andothers 1978, Kwan andothers 1983), formulated by the medical physics department at the Adenbrooke's Hospital, were used to plan exact isodose curves and calculate the spacing between the wires. The planned total radiation dose was 50 to 60 Gy for each of the lesions, to be given at a rate of 10 Gy per day, corresponding to a 'low-dose radiation' (LDR) protocol.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of implant placement was dependent on the size and shape of the tumour and the surrounding structures. Computer-assisted dosimetry calculations (Neblett andothers 1978, Kwan andothers 1983), formulated by the medical physics department at the Adenbrooke's Hospital, were used to plan exact isodose curves and calculate the spacing between the wires. The planned total radiation dose was 50 to 60 Gy for each of the lesions, to be given at a rate of 10 Gy per day, corresponding to a 'low-dose radiation' (LDR) protocol.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%