1986
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(86)90044-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized density contouring and statistical evaluation of orientation data using counting circles and continuous weighting functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results were processed with Anisoft 3 software using Jelinek statistics (Jelinek, 1978), and performing structural correction. SpheriStat software was used for applying Gaussian counting point density distribution statistics (E = 3 * Sigma; Robin and Jowett, 1986) and to facilitate plotting all the AMS data in high quality stereodiagrams: the susceptibility axes and their means, point density distribution curves, bedding and magnetic foliation planes (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Sampling and Laboratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results were processed with Anisoft 3 software using Jelinek statistics (Jelinek, 1978), and performing structural correction. SpheriStat software was used for applying Gaussian counting point density distribution statistics (E = 3 * Sigma; Robin and Jowett, 1986) and to facilitate plotting all the AMS data in high quality stereodiagrams: the susceptibility axes and their means, point density distribution curves, bedding and magnetic foliation planes (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Sampling and Laboratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short and long name of sites is described as well as bedding plane and facies (I = proximal, II = intermediate and III = distal). In each site 2 statistics (Stat column) are shown, J : Jelinek's statistic (Jelinek, 1978); D: Gaussian counting (E = 3 * Sigma) point density distribution (Robin and Jowett, 1986). k 1 is maximum AMS axis and k 3 is the minimum.…”
Section: Susceptibility and Ams Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No clear cross-cutting relationships, giving the relative ages of the joints, are discernible. The principal joint trend, determined statistically using a circular counting routine (Robin and Jowett, 1986), is 091°. The secondary trends are 027° and 152°, corresponding to the orientations of topographic lineaments (Table I 1 Fig.…”
Section: Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plots show a) all data collected, b) data from Unit 4, c) data from Unit 3T, and d) data from Unit 3. Lower hemisphere equal area stereonets are contoured using the Gaussian counting method of Robin and Jowett (1986). Contour intervals are equal to E + 2σ, E + 4σ, etc., where E is the number of points expected to be found in the counting circle if points were extracted randomly from a uniform population and σ is the standard deviation.…”
Section: Fractures and Minor Faults At Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the computer program Spheristat (© Pangaea Scientific), we determined preferred orientations using a Gaussian counting routine (Robin and Jowett 1986) that allows determination of the principal directions of the strain ellipse with 2σ uncertainties (Fig. 11).…”
Section: Appendix a Whole Rock Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%