2017
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized Cognitive Training in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: CCT is efficacious on global cognition, select cognitive domains, and psychosocial functioning in people with mild cognitive impairment. This intervention therefore warrants longer-term and larger-scale trials to examine effects on conversion to dementia. Conversely, evidence for efficacy in people with dementia is weak and limited to trials of immersive technologies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
466
3
18

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 567 publications
(562 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
27
466
3
18
Order By: Relevance
“…APOE 4 carriers did not show any benefit from training in this domain. These findings are completely consistent with those recently obtained by Hill et al [71]. However, considering that this scale is mainly used for screening, we must be cautious when interpreting this collateral training effect on mood, as all subjects had normal scores on the GDS-15 (that is, between 0 and 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…APOE 4 carriers did not show any benefit from training in this domain. These findings are completely consistent with those recently obtained by Hill et al [71]. However, considering that this scale is mainly used for screening, we must be cautious when interpreting this collateral training effect on mood, as all subjects had normal scores on the GDS-15 (that is, between 0 and 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, these analyses were underpowered due to the small number of studies. Interestingly, other recent meta-analyses have noted that effects of CT are not greater relative to nocontact vs. active control conditions (Hill et al 2016). At the same time, if beliefs or expectations of improvement were driving cognitive training effects, then various types of cognitive training would show similar performance improvements, which is clearly not the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Woods et al 2012;van Nes, 2013;Genoe & Dupuis, 2014;Hill et al 2017;Mondini et al 2016;Spector et al, 2017 Individual activities Individual activities as a source to gain strength and to nurture social relationships.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%