2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerisation of a paper-based intravenous insulin protocol reduces errors in a prospective crossover simulated tight glycaemic control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost simulations of our hospital's five-bed ICU suggested that this may allow cost cuts of US $14,000 per year in personnel expenses related to nurses. The high number of incidents has also been quoted as the second issue in the management of blood glucose using the sliding-scale method [13]. Nurses dealing with the care of critically ill patients in the ICU are constantly under tension and stress [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost simulations of our hospital's five-bed ICU suggested that this may allow cost cuts of US $14,000 per year in personnel expenses related to nurses. The high number of incidents has also been quoted as the second issue in the management of blood glucose using the sliding-scale method [13]. Nurses dealing with the care of critically ill patients in the ICU are constantly under tension and stress [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computerized insulin infusion protocols such as Glucommander (Glytec, Greenville, SC) have been demonstrated to improve glycemic control, decrease the risk of calculation errors, and can provide reminders for BG checks. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] A recent study demonstrated a 98.2% adherence rate to the insulin dose prescribed when using the Space GlucoseControl system (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany). 23 However, errors can still occur in sampling interval, data entry, and pump programming.…”
Section: Nurse-managed Insulin Infusion Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in the quality of care and patient outcomes were the focuses of 3 papers (Andreessen, Wilde, & Herendeen, 2012;De Laat, Schoonhoven, Pickkers, Verbeek, & Van Achterberg, 2006;Sinuff, Cook, Randall, & Allen, 2003), and both changes in clinical practices and patient outcomes after the implementation of CCGs were the focuses of 6 papers (Abbott, Dremsa, Stewart, Mark, & Swift, 2006;Habich et al, 2012;Higuchi, Davies, Edwards, Ploeg, & Virani, 2011;Hoekstra et al, 2010;McMullin et al, 2006;Webb, Flagg, & Fink, 2006). Twelve of the studies used the form of a pre-and post-evaluation design (Abbott et al, 2006;Andreessen et al, 2012;Britton et al, 2013;De Laat et al, 2006;Diby et al, 2005;Gurses et al, 2008;Habich et al, 2012;Hyde & Murphy, 2012;Lee et al, 2010;McMullin et al, 2006;Sinuff et al, 2003;Webb et al, 2006). One study used structured observations (Johansson et al, 2008), 1 used semistructured interviews (Gurses et al, 2008), 1 used record audits (Higuchi et al, 2011), and 1 used a combination of surveys, observations, and focus group interviews (M. Thomas et al, 2010).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying algorithm was the same as that with the paper protocol, but special alerts were built into the system, and the system also provided suggestions for care. In addition, the program displayed the patient's insulin rate and time for the next glucose check (Lee et al, 2010). One paper described the use of mobile workstations on which shortcuts to clinical guidelines were installed on desktop computers.…”
Section: Effects On the Process Of Care Of Ccgsmentioning
confidence: 99%