Computerassistierte Analyse von Mammographien in der klinischen Routinediagnostik

Abstract

Our experience with the use of the CAD-system in daily routine showed that CAD analysis can easily be integrated into a preexisting mammography unit. However, the diagnostic benefit is not yet clearly established. Since the rate of false negative marks by the CAD-system Image Checker is still high, the results of CAD analysis must be checked and corrected by an observer well experienced in mammography reading.

Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: Two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate

“…Of the retrieved papers not included, four were excluded since the results they reported were contained in other papers that were included,(32-35) three described studies comparing CAD to double reading rather than single reading, (36)(37)(38) and four were on selected cases not an unselected sequence of screening cases. (39)(40)(41)(42) Two of the included papers were published after the initial search and identified when the searches were repeated immediately prior to publication. (14;15) Table 1 summarises the ten included studies: six matched and four unmatched.…”

CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments

“…Typically, higher sensitivities were found for microcalcifications than for masses [98 vs. 89% [25]]; other studies reached similar results regarding the overall sensitivity using different systems and different study designs [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”