2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Vision–Based Estimation of Flood Depth in Flooded-Vehicle Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey of window and door heights in the test area may also be considered to obtain the most reliable ground truth heights for the comparison of model performance. In addition to the forecast flood water depth, water level estimations can also be extracted from geotagged social media images or surveillance camera data, based on people (Feng et al, 2020), vehicles (Park et al, 2021), or stop signs (Kharazi and Behzadan, 2021) in the flood water. This real-time information source has the potential to optimize the current forecastbased building flood risk mapping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of window and door heights in the test area may also be considered to obtain the most reliable ground truth heights for the comparison of model performance. In addition to the forecast flood water depth, water level estimations can also be extracted from geotagged social media images or surveillance camera data, based on people (Feng et al, 2020), vehicles (Park et al, 2021), or stop signs (Kharazi and Behzadan, 2021) in the flood water. This real-time information source has the potential to optimize the current forecastbased building flood risk mapping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple solutions for reflection removal are based on the analysis of multiple input images, including pairs of images that are taken from different orientations, or with different polarizations (Sarel and Irani, 2004;Kong et al, 2013). Table 1) A commonly used metric for describing the discrepancy in flood depth estimation is mean absolute error (MAE) (Chaudhary et al, 2019;Cohen et al, 2019;Park et al, 2021;Alizadeh and Behzadan, 2020;. As shown in Equation ( 1), the MAE for pole length estimation (𝑀𝐴𝐸 ! )…”
Section: Techniques To Overcome Challenging Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obtained an MAE of 4 in. by detecting submerged objects in social media images, and comparing them with their predefined sizes Park et al (2021). reported an MAE of 2.5 in.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, this cross-domain perception gap can be addressed with CycleGAN by transferring the visual information in the two involved domains into an identical one. In civil engineering, researchers have explored GANs' capability to generate plausible new samples as a promising data augmentation technique for improving performance in structural defect detection (Gao et al, 2019;Maeda et al, 2020), construction resource management (Bang et al, 2020), and flood depth estimation (S. Park et al, 2021). However, CycleGAN has rarely been applied for style transfer in civil engineering contexts, with only a few exceptions (Hong et al, 2020;Pouyanfar et al, 2019).…”
Section: Cross-domain Style Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%