2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer vision-based construction progress monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Cameras are cheap, portable, easy to use, and available on almost all mobile devices, making them a preferred alternative over other technologies. However, processing camera images using SfM have a relatively high computational cost if the images are not in sequence and also requires acceptable capturing conditions like lighting, distance, and adequate and obstacle-free field of view for accurate results (Reja, et al, 2022). (Braun, et al, 2020) Digital Images UAV Outdoor (Vincke, et al, 2019) Laser Scanning or Photogrammetry Manual Both (Han, et al, 2018) Photogrammetry/Laser Scanning UAV Both (Arif and Khan, 2021) Videography Fixed Both (Kim, Kim and Lee, 2020) Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry UAV Both (Wang, et al, 2021) Video Camera Fixed Outdoor (Kopsida and Brilakis, 2020) RGBD Camera Manual Indoor (Mahami, et al, 2019) Photogrammetry Manual Both (Maalek, et al, 2019) Laser Scanning Manual Both (Bognot, et al, 2018) Videogrammetry UAS Outdoor (Omar, et al, 2018) Photogrammetry Manual Outdoor (Pučko, et al, 2018) RGBD Camera Manual Both…”
Section: Cameras (Images and Videos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Cameras are cheap, portable, easy to use, and available on almost all mobile devices, making them a preferred alternative over other technologies. However, processing camera images using SfM have a relatively high computational cost if the images are not in sequence and also requires acceptable capturing conditions like lighting, distance, and adequate and obstacle-free field of view for accurate results (Reja, et al, 2022). (Braun, et al, 2020) Digital Images UAV Outdoor (Vincke, et al, 2019) Laser Scanning or Photogrammetry Manual Both (Han, et al, 2018) Photogrammetry/Laser Scanning UAV Both (Arif and Khan, 2021) Videography Fixed Both (Kim, Kim and Lee, 2020) Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry UAV Both (Wang, et al, 2021) Video Camera Fixed Outdoor (Kopsida and Brilakis, 2020) RGBD Camera Manual Indoor (Mahami, et al, 2019) Photogrammetry Manual Both (Maalek, et al, 2019) Laser Scanning Manual Both (Bognot, et al, 2018) Videogrammetry UAS Outdoor (Omar, et al, 2018) Photogrammetry Manual Outdoor (Pučko, et al, 2018) RGBD Camera Manual Both…”
Section: Cameras (Images and Videos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study identifies the factors based on their use in literature while choosing the technology and method and the authors' experience in this field. Our recent study identified these factors (Reja, Varghese and Ha, 2022) by a thorough review of the literature using a well-defined PRISMA methodology.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Data Acquisition Technology Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Progress monitoring is a procedure to review, track, and orchestrate the performance of construction projects [ 1 ], referring to comparing and inspecting the daily on-site progress of work activities with the constructed plan and validating the projected performance [ 2 ]. Progress monitoring of the construction project is crucial and enables construction managers to make timely decisions based on vital inputs [ 3 ]. In the success of construction projects, effective progress measurement is a critical key parameter [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%