1966
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1966.tb00907.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Treatment of Magnetic Measurements From Archaeological Sites

Abstract: The last decade has seen the modest application of geophysical methods to archaeological problems. Various techniques have been tried including magnetic, seismic and electrical resistivity measurement. Of these, the first has proven most useful in temperate Europe because the measured phenomenon does not depend on temporal climatic variation. The sites in this part of the world are usually not deeply buried, and the features which are sought are frequently o f simple geometric shape. These include walls, ditch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Archaeogeophysists have successfully applied and optimized geophysical methodologies to investigate numerous archaeological sites around the world (e.g., Aspinall et al 2008;2009;Conyers 2010;Conyers and Leckebusch 2010;Conyers et al 2008;Kvamme 2003a;Thompson et al 2011;. Used primarily as a tool for archaeological prospection, geophysical techniques have been developed for over half a century for the near-surface mapping of archaeological sites (Scollar and Krückeberg 1966). The earliest attempts at prospection were focused on large scale archaeological anomalies such as brick or stone foundations and walls, or detecting geophysical responses in soils resulting from anthropogenic manipulation Geophysics provides a useful tool to survey and map hunter-gatherer sites, especially in Arctic regions.…”
Section: Arctic Geophysical and Remote Sensing Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeogeophysists have successfully applied and optimized geophysical methodologies to investigate numerous archaeological sites around the world (e.g., Aspinall et al 2008;2009;Conyers 2010;Conyers and Leckebusch 2010;Conyers et al 2008;Kvamme 2003a;Thompson et al 2011;. Used primarily as a tool for archaeological prospection, geophysical techniques have been developed for over half a century for the near-surface mapping of archaeological sites (Scollar and Krückeberg 1966). The earliest attempts at prospection were focused on large scale archaeological anomalies such as brick or stone foundations and walls, or detecting geophysical responses in soils resulting from anthropogenic manipulation Geophysics provides a useful tool to survey and map hunter-gatherer sites, especially in Arctic regions.…”
Section: Arctic Geophysical and Remote Sensing Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bevan and Kenyon 1975) and algorithms for data processing and display (e.g. Scollar and Krückeberg 1966) provide some sense of the wide geographical and intellectual scope of this 'Golden Age' of archaeological prospection throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Gaffney and Gater (2003) reflect on the apparent decline of research interest in the discipline following this initial burst of development.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Geophysical Prospection For Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These striations tend to mask the underlying features of archaeological interest, and hence to increase the difficulty of interpretation. Although it is intended to apply filtering techniques to remove the striations and to enhance the underlying features (Scollar 1970), such methods go beyond the scope intended for the present paper. Nevertheless, there are features towards the upper left-hand corner of the diagram which appear to be of archaeological origin and which correspond to crop marks shown in aerial photographs.…”
Section: F I E L D Testmentioning
confidence: 99%