2018
DOI: 10.1002/cae.22049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer technologies for model‐based collaborative learning: A research‐based approach with initial findings

Abstract: Computer‐based technologies are changing at an accelerating pace and becoming increasingly complex. Smart and context‐aware devices and Internet access enable children and adult learners to gain factual and procedure knowledge about many things anywhere at any time. These computer‐based technologies, if well‐utilized in support of learning, can promote personalized and collaborative education, which research suggests are valuable pedagogies. However, new technologies create a burden on designers and educators … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anastasiades et al (2010) more specifically stressed that this setting can strengthen the social relations among students and teachers of the local and the remote class, and strengthen students' willingness to make new contacts all over the world. Also Liu, Spector, & Ikle (2018) stressed that social benefit to students included providing equal learning opportunities to under-represented students. Likewise, this flexibility ensures that the synchronous hybrid learning environment can guarantee continuity of instruction and promotes student retention (Lakhal, Bateman & Bédard, 2017;Ramsey, Evans & Levy, 2016;Wang, Lang Quek & Hu, 2017;Wiley & Ball, 2013).…”
Section: Pedagogical Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anastasiades et al (2010) more specifically stressed that this setting can strengthen the social relations among students and teachers of the local and the remote class, and strengthen students' willingness to make new contacts all over the world. Also Liu, Spector, & Ikle (2018) stressed that social benefit to students included providing equal learning opportunities to under-represented students. Likewise, this flexibility ensures that the synchronous hybrid learning environment can guarantee continuity of instruction and promotes student retention (Lakhal, Bateman & Bédard, 2017;Ramsey, Evans & Levy, 2016;Wang, Lang Quek & Hu, 2017;Wiley & Ball, 2013).…”
Section: Pedagogical Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by Bower et al, 2015 , ideally in the years to come, rich-media collaborative technologies will become so invisible that students and teachers interacting from different locations will feel as though they are in the same room. Yet, Liu et al (2018) stress that we still have a long way to reach to these desired states.…”
Section: Rq5: Gaps Identifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, factor analysis is not appropriate. And there is KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) test [5,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Its mathematical expression is…”
Section: Analysis Of Learning Adaptability Factors Based On Moocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to its ability to accommodate students' needs by offering flexibility in course attendance so that students could learn anywhere anytime [4]. It helps bridge some educational equity gap especially for the underrepresented population who may have a conflicting work schedule or family responsibilities that may otherwise drop out of school [5,6]. However, research also shows that those who were firstgeneration, low income, and non-White had significantly lower levels of technological access (ownership, access to, and usage of computer devices as well as access to Internet services) [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%