1964
DOI: 10.1139/b64-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Taxonomy in the Fungi Imperfecti

Abstract: In Part I of this paper, the principles of numerical taxonomy are discussed and the practical processes outlined, with particular reference to their applicability to the Fungi Imperfecti.In Part II, one of the authors (J.R.P.) discusses several scoring methods, including one introduced by the authors in which a 'primary' character is weighted according to the number of 'secondary' characters used to describe it. The merits of the various methods are considered.In Part III, one of the authors (W.B.K.) discusses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hughes (1953) made the earliest attempt at a comprehensive classification of the anamorph fungi using characters of conidiophore and conidial development. This system was built upon by subsequent workers (see the publications of the Kananaskas Conferences; Kendrick 1971Kendrick , 1979. Cole and Samson (1979) beautifully illustrated and clearly explained conidial development in many conidial fungi.…”
Section: E Anamorphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hughes (1953) made the earliest attempt at a comprehensive classification of the anamorph fungi using characters of conidiophore and conidial development. This system was built upon by subsequent workers (see the publications of the Kananaskas Conferences; Kendrick 1971Kendrick , 1979. Cole and Samson (1979) beautifully illustrated and clearly explained conidial development in many conidial fungi.…”
Section: E Anamorphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hughes (1953), who proposed that conidium ontogeny be used as a primary character for sorting anamorphic fungi. Many refinements to the complexly defined eight "sections" of the Hughes system were proposed, for example by Tubaki (1958) and Barron (1968), culminating in the formalization of definitions and concepts at the first Kananaskis Conference (Kendrick 1971). The fundamental structures, conidioma (a specialized multihyphal, conidia-bearing structure, under which term acervulus, pycnidium, sporodochium, and synnema are included, see Figs.…”
Section: The History Of the Classification Of Anamorphic Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publication of these concepts led to an explosion of research on the production of conidia (mostly in hyphomycetes) using time-Iapse photography and electron microscopy (Cole and Samson 1979;Mangenot and Reisinger 1976). Minter et al (1982Minter et al ( , 1983a reemphasized the distinction between development of conidia (ontogeny), proliferation of the conidiogenous ceIls, and maturation of conidia, originaIly introduced by Kendrick (in Kendrick 1971). They paid particular attention to the behavior of cell walls during the three processes and proposed a stepwise system for describing conidiogenesis.…”
Section: The History Of the Classification Of Anamorphic Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have been spending time in argument about the definition of "holoblastic" and "enteroblastic" (5,7,16,18,24), but we have no clear idea on that. Kendrick (17) and others treated "annellidic" and "tretic" as "holoblastic" and "enteroblastic," respectively.…”
Section: Morphological Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%