2003
DOI: 10.1177/03635465030310012701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Simulations of Patellofemoral Joint Surgery

Abstract: Computer simulation may serve as a valuable tool for tailoring procedures to specific patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure applied to lateral cartilage increases with the lateral position of the patellar tendon attachment at the tibial tuberosity (Ramappa et al 2006; Saranathan et al 2012), and medialization of the tibial tuberosity is a common approach for surgical patellar realignment. Multiple computational models have characterized the influence of the orientation of the patellar tendon on the patellofemoral pressure distribution without specifically validating the models for variations in the orientation of the patellar tendon (Benvenuti et al 1997; Cohen et al 2003; Fernandez and Hunter, 2005; Shirazi-Adl and Mesfar 2007). A modeling system that represented cartilage with elastic springs was shown to accurately characterize how varying the orientation of the patellar tendon influences patellofemoral contact pressures (Elias and Saranathan 2013), but that system cannot characterize how pressure varies throughout the thickness of cartilage or produce other relevant pressure output, such as hydrostatic pressure and octahedral shear stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure applied to lateral cartilage increases with the lateral position of the patellar tendon attachment at the tibial tuberosity (Ramappa et al 2006; Saranathan et al 2012), and medialization of the tibial tuberosity is a common approach for surgical patellar realignment. Multiple computational models have characterized the influence of the orientation of the patellar tendon on the patellofemoral pressure distribution without specifically validating the models for variations in the orientation of the patellar tendon (Benvenuti et al 1997; Cohen et al 2003; Fernandez and Hunter, 2005; Shirazi-Adl and Mesfar 2007). A modeling system that represented cartilage with elastic springs was shown to accurately characterize how varying the orientation of the patellar tendon influences patellofemoral contact pressures (Elias and Saranathan 2013), but that system cannot characterize how pressure varies throughout the thickness of cartilage or produce other relevant pressure output, such as hydrostatic pressure and octahedral shear stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validated computational models can be used to overcome some of the limitations of in vivo and in vitro experiments; multiple procedures can be virtually performed on the same knee and compared under repeated loading conditions. Similar models have been used to evaluate cartilage damage in osteoarthritic patients (Cohen et al, 2003b), and simulate PF joint surgery (Cohen et al, 2003a), but typically are not validated under both healthy and altered conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common techniques include image-based FEM [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], rigid body spring modeling/discrete element analysis (RBSM) [14][15][16], or SCM [17][18][19]. The models are either displacement driven or force driven.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models are either displacement driven or force driven. Generally, model geometries are acquired from modalities such as computed tomography (CT) [4][5][6][7][8]14,15,19] or MRI [9][10][11]17,18]. Kinematics are determined through external (surface markers) or internal (biplanar radiography) measures, while tendon forces are estimated from corresponding musculature electromyography (EMG) and cross-sectional area, and ground reaction forces are measured using force platforms [11,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation