2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2003.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulations of gas–solid flow in spouted beds using kinetic–frictional stress model of granular flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solid velocities in both the spout and the annular zones decrease as the radial distance from the center of the bed is higher and the velocity profiles in the two zones become flatter until zero velocity is recorded at the top of the fountain, and the particles then fall onto the annular zone. These results are qualitatively similar to those obtained by Goldschmidt et al, 15 Kmiec, 16 Olazar et al,8,26,27 and Huilin et al 68 for conical-cylindrical spouted beds and jet-spouted beds.As static bed height is increased from 0.012 m (Figure 14) to 0.024 m (Figure 15) and then to 0.048 m (Figure 16), once the spout has been formed the air in all cases passes preferentially through this central bed zone. As observed, the mean axial solid velocities at the bottom (at z 5 0.05 m) for a high air velocity ( Figures 14D-16D) are different for the three static bed heights studied, 0.012, 0.024, and 0.048 m. Visual observations reveal that high static bed heights cause particle agglomeration.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solid velocities in both the spout and the annular zones decrease as the radial distance from the center of the bed is higher and the velocity profiles in the two zones become flatter until zero velocity is recorded at the top of the fountain, and the particles then fall onto the annular zone. These results are qualitatively similar to those obtained by Goldschmidt et al, 15 Kmiec, 16 Olazar et al,8,26,27 and Huilin et al 68 for conical-cylindrical spouted beds and jet-spouted beds.As static bed height is increased from 0.012 m (Figure 14) to 0.024 m (Figure 15) and then to 0.048 m (Figure 16), once the spout has been formed the air in all cases passes preferentially through this central bed zone. As observed, the mean axial solid velocities at the bottom (at z 5 0.05 m) for a high air velocity ( Figures 14D-16D) are different for the three static bed heights studied, 0.012, 0.024, and 0.048 m. Visual observations reveal that high static bed heights cause particle agglomeration.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…The formation of the spout in the center and in the annulus near the walls is also observed. 23,65,68 The spout and annular zones are not defined in conical fluidized beds, and a vigorous particle motion is observed at high airflow velocities, as shown in Figures 12D-13D. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Following this approach, studies have been conducted to expand the dimensionless-groups of spouted beds by adding the restitution coefficient (e s , which accounts for the inelasticity of particles collision) or the friction of particles [199]. This parameter becomes crucial due to the important role that the interparticle collisions play in the fountain and spout regions.…”
Section: Conicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this term leads to better results in dense gas-solid fluidized bed [15,[33][34][35]. Similar to several researchers, the restitution coefficient of 0.9 was used in the current simulation [24,25,36].…”
Section: Table 2 Closure Relationships For Two-fluid Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%