2003
DOI: 10.1021/jp030534x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Simulation of Urea−Water Mixtures:  A Test of Force Field Parameters for Use in Biomolecular Simulation

Abstract: A molecular model for urea to be used in conjunction with the simple point charge (SPC) model for liquid water in protein denaturation studies is validated by comparison of molecular dynamics (MD) simulation results to experimental data at 298 K as a function of urea mole fraction. The density, enthalpy of mixing, free enthalpy of urea hydration, and urea diffusion show very good agreement with the experimental values. The experimental error in the free enthalpy of hydration, which is dominated by the inaccura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
123
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
123
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30 Our diffusion constants of OPLS urea in TIP3P are in good accord with those measured in SPC water. 28 The SPC/E water model is a revised version of the SPC model and shows good agreement for the diffusion constant of urea with experimental values although the water still moves a bit too fast. 13,27 Due to a greater slope, as the urea concentration increases, diffusion constants of both urea and water are in somewhat better agreement with experimental values at high concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…29,30 Our diffusion constants of OPLS urea in TIP3P are in good accord with those measured in SPC water. 28 The SPC/E water model is a revised version of the SPC model and shows good agreement for the diffusion constant of urea with experimental values although the water still moves a bit too fast. 13,27 Due to a greater slope, as the urea concentration increases, diffusion constants of both urea and water are in somewhat better agreement with experimental values at high concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The thermodynamic properties, such as energy and density of mixing, are of particular importance when the free energy of solvation and folding of solutes is to be calculated. [8,9,[41][42][43] The properties of a mixture of two solvents need not be a linear function of its composition, as illustrated for water/ dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) mixtures in Figure 9. Only the dielectric permittivity e shows a linear behavior, while the other properties considered show different types of nonlinearity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it would be too expensive to do the convergence tests for all concentrations, we simply use a large cut-off 1.4 nm for the concentration dependency study of TBA/water. Electrostatic interactions were calculated using the reaction-field term [27] with a dielectric permittivity of 54 for urea in SPC water [17], 64.8 for TBA in SPC water [18], 61 for other solutes in SPC water, 19 for methanol and 46 for DMSO as the solvent [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%