2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulation of the elastically driven migration of a flat grain boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stress-driven boundary motion has been observed experimentally, [29][30][31]50,53,54] as well as predicted by simulations [33,34] and theory. [55] Recent experimental results by Rupert et al [30] confirmed much of this theory in NC aluminum, although for monotonic tensile stresses.…”
Section: A Adiffusional Grain Growthmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stress-driven boundary motion has been observed experimentally, [29][30][31]50,53,54] as well as predicted by simulations [33,34] and theory. [55] Recent experimental results by Rupert et al [30] confirmed much of this theory in NC aluminum, although for monotonic tensile stresses.…”
Section: A Adiffusional Grain Growthmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…[28] Previous experimental observations of NC grain growth during plastic deformation, [29,30] indentation experiments [31] and as a result of fatigue loading [14,32] warrant serious consideration. The grain growth reported by Witney et al's [14] fatigue experiments on NC Cu presumably refers to modest overall grain growth, rather than discontinuous local coarsening observed in monotonic loading experiments by Gianola et al [29] In addition, several numerical models predicted evolution in NC grain structures under both elastic [33,34] and plastic [35][36][37] deformation. These previous observations on room-temperature mechanically driven grain growth lead one to suspect that NC metals may evolve such coarse grain structures during fatigue loading, and that the fatigue mechanisms may be influenced more by the evolved grain structure than by the initial structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other grain-boundary ͑GB͒ mobility calculations, using different Cu potentials, have found similar values ͑24-31 kJ/ mol͒ for different types of GB. [34][35][36] Figure 5͑a͒ shows the number of annealing twins observed in an average cross section of the sample ͑the area is 716 nm 2 ͒ as a function of time for the annealing treatment at 800 K. The number of twins increases with time in a kinetics that closely resembles the kinetics of the observed grain growth. If the number of twins is divided by the number of grains in the same cross section of the sample, we can easily obtain an average number of twins per grain, which can be analyzed as a function of grain size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1B, where x, y, and z axes define laboratory coordinates and [100], [010], and [001] define crystallographic axes), giving rise to a change in the elastic free energy of each grain (the crystals are elastically anisotropic) and a thermodynamic driving force for GB displacement. Computation details were described in our previous articles (21,22). Cooperative particle motion within the GB.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%