Polycrystalline materials are composites of crystalline particles or ''grains'' separated by thin ''amorphous'' grain boundaries (GBs). Although GBs have been exhaustively investigated at low temperatures, at which these regions are relatively ordered, much less is known about them at higher temperatures, where they exhibit significant mobility and structural disorder and characterization methods are limited. The time and spatial scales accessible to molecular dynamics (MD) simulation are appropriate for investigating the dynamical and structural properties of GBs at elevated temperatures, and we exploit MD to explore basic aspects of GB dynamics as a function of temperature. It has long been hypothesized that GBs have features in common with glass-forming liquids based on the processing characteristics of polycrystalline materials. We find remarkable support for this suggestion, as evidenced by string-like collective atomic motion and transient caging of atomic motion, and a non-Arrhenius GB mobility describing the average rate of large-scale GB displacement.glass formation ͉ grain-boundary mobility ͉ molecular dynamics ͉ polycrystalline materials ͉ string-like collective motion M ost technologically important materials are polycrystalline in nature (1), and it is appreciated that the grain boundaries (GBs) of these materials, the interfacial region separating the crystal grains (see Fig. 1A), significantly influence the properties of this broad class of materials (2). In particular, the dynamical properties of GBs, such as the GB mobility (M), play an important role in the plastic deformation and evolution of microstructure during material processing and service (3). † The atomic organization in the GBs represents a compromise between the ordering effects of adjacent grains, and ''packing frustration'' [or reduced packing efficiency (6)] is also characteristic of glass-forming (GF) fluids, in which particle ordering is likewise limited in range (7). This simple observation leads us to expect similarities between the dynamics of GBs and GF fluids, and below we provide evidence for this relationship. By implication, GB migration should then be sensitive to impurities, geometrical confinement, and applied stresses-basically any factor that affects particle-packing efficiency (8-10). To illustrate this point and test our perspective of GB dynamics, we quantitatively interpret differences in the effect of large tensile and compressive deformations on M in terms of measures of cooperative atomic motion drawn from the physics of GF fluids.Nearly 100 years ago, Rosenhain and Ewen (11) suggested that metal grains in cast iron were ''cemented'' together by a thin layer of ''amorphous'' (i.e., noncrystalline) material ''identical with or at least closely analogous to the condition of a greatly undercooled liquid.'' Although this conceptual model was able to rationalize processing characteristics of ferritic materials (11), it was not possible to validate it at the time through direct observation or simulation. Sixty year...