2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulation of phase transformation and plastic deformation in IN718 superalloy: Microstructural evolution during precipitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8a). The current results correspond to simulations carried out by Zhou et al [35]. Further increase in the temperature of annealing leads primarily to the growth of precipitates (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…8a). The current results correspond to simulations carried out by Zhou et al [35]. Further increase in the temperature of annealing leads primarily to the growth of precipitates (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the diffusion length is adopted as half of the SDAS in this work, and the local solidification velocity is defined as Accordingly, a modified dimensionless microsegregation index (MMSI) is extended into Eq. [6] based on the MSI criterion proposed by Nastac:…”
Section: Relationship Between the Microsegregation And Laves Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segregation and Laves phase increase the hot tearing sensitivity of INCONEL718 alloy castings and harmfully influence their final properties owing to the depletion of potent solution strengthening elements for Ni-rich matrix. [5,6] Therefore, the cooling rate is one of the most important technological parameters that should be controlled during manufacturing complex thin-wall components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of this effect cannot be explained by differences in the elastic moduli of matrix and precipitate, since these do not differ greatly from phase to phase. Instead, it is the fault energies associated with anti-phase boundaries (APBs) and stacking faults (SFs) which are responsible for it [4,5]. Their magnitudes severely limit the penetration of the c 0 phase achieved by the dislocations introduced during deformation, and thus bulk plastic flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%