Computer Simulation of Leadership, Consensus Decision Making and Collective Behaviour in Humans

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of a crowd simulation model developed by the authors by reproducing Dyer et al.'s experiments (published in Philosophical Transactions in 2009) on human leadership and consensus decision making in a computer-based environment. The theoretical crowd model of the simulation environment is presented, and its results are compared and analysed against Dyer et al.'s original experiments. It is concluded that the simulation results are largely consistent with the experiments, which demonstrates the reliability of the crowd model. Furthermore, the simulation data also reveals several additional new findings, namely: 1) the phenomena of sacrificing accuracy to reach a quicker consensus decision found in ants colonies was also discovered in the simulation; 2) the ability of reaching consensus in groups has a direct impact on the time and accuracy of arriving at the target position; 3) the positions of the informed individuals or leaders in the crowd could have significant impact on the overall crowd movement; and 4) the simulation also confirmed Dyer et al.'s anecdotal evidence of the proportion of the leadership in large crowds and its effect on crowd movement. The potential applications of these findings are highlighted in the final discussion of this paper.

Modelling the Emergence of Shared Attitudes from Group Dynamics Using an Agent‐Based Model of Social Comparison Theory

“…Agent‐based models are increasingly used to simulate psychological behavior at the microlevel in a variety of research areas: from attitudes (Dubois et al ., ; Kitto and Boschetti, ), health behavior (Orr and Plaut, ), self‐perception (Wang et al ., ) to leadership (Wu and Sun, ). Much like the current study, this work highlights the necessity of better defining agents in terms of psychological processes before examining higher levels, such as the interactions between individuals.…”

Cognitive Distance, Absorptive Capacity and Group Rationality: A Simulation Study

“…Although common in behavioral ecology, simulation studies starting from real life data [16] [17] [18] [19] , are seldom used in disciplines like Social Psychology or Management [20] . Our study provides initial support for using simulation studies to explore group decision making and in particular our results speak to the need of using more computational experiments that extend our understanding of the emergence of collective group level properties, in particular group rationality.…”

Framework for Inferring Leadership Dynamics of Complex Movement from Time Series

“…In the Crowd Model (CM) [28], there are two types of individuals: informed and uninformed individuals. For each time step, informed individuals move toward the target independently while uninformed individuals keep staying close to both group's position and direction centroids.…”