1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0273(98)00031-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-simulation models of scoria cone degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
100
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past decade an increasing number of scientific works have addressed research questions about scoria cone degradation. Various approaches have been suggested to define and measure volcanic cone dimensions [10,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. These methods advocate measuring cone morphometric parameters to generate discrimination diagrams, as well as using volcanic slope angles as a key physical parameter to indicate typical erosion paths and relative erosional trends over time for scoria cones (on a scale of up to millions of years).…”
Section: Proposed Geositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade an increasing number of scientific works have addressed research questions about scoria cone degradation. Various approaches have been suggested to define and measure volcanic cone dimensions [10,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. These methods advocate measuring cone morphometric parameters to generate discrimination diagrams, as well as using volcanic slope angles as a key physical parameter to indicate typical erosion paths and relative erosional trends over time for scoria cones (on a scale of up to millions of years).…”
Section: Proposed Geositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard definition of these parameters is based on measurements derived from topographic maps. In Hooper and Sheridan (1998) cone width is calculated as the average of the maximum and minimum basal diameters for each cone and cone height is defined as the difference between average basal elevation and maximum crater rim or summit elevation. The methodology adopted to measure the morphometric parameters over topographic maps is similar to that introduced by Wood (1980a) and summarized by Hooper (1995).…”
Section: Topographic Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of cinder cones erosion might be associated to the period of time of exposure to degradation processes. The progressive change of morphometric parameters with increasing of age is the basis for relative dating of cones by comparative measurements (Wood, 1980a;Hooper and Sheridan, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4. Comparison of morphometric parameters in the Bajawa complex with those of cones in the San Francisco Volcanic Field (Hooper and Sheridan, 1998) n, number of cones; Hco/Wco, cone height/cone basal diameter; Save, average slope angle. Each parameter is listed with one standard deviation (±1σ).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Petrological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degradational evolution of these cones can be correlated to the length of time that they have been exposed to erosion. The progressive decrease in cone height (H co ), cone height/width ratio (H co /W co ), and slope angle with increasing age is the basis for a relative dating of cones by comparative measurements (Wood, 1980b;Hooper and Sheridan, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%