ContextComputing was added to England's National Curriculum in 2014 with the intent of providing young people with the skills, knowledge and ways of thinking necessary to participate fully in an increasingly digitalized world, as citizens as well as potential tech entrepreneurs and computer scientists. What was not accounted for was how teachers would interpret this education policy and whether there might be a mismatch between the narratives reflected in the new program of study and the professional beliefs and practices of classroom teachers.There is a critical gap in the field's understanding of how best to teach modern digital skills on a nationwide scale. Research on nationwide computing education policy especially is limited (Crick, 2017;European Schoolnet, 2015;Passey, 2017) and it is difficult to transfer results from one country context to another (Hubwieser, 2013). Small-scale studies of computing education generally focus on the integration of technology into individual or small groupings of schools (Becta, 2006(Becta, , 2008Moss et al., 2007;Somekh et al., 2007), rather than on implementation
AbstractThe addition of computing to England's National Curriculum was welcomed as a muchneeded modernization of the country's digital skills curriculum, replacing a poorly regarded ICT program of study with an industry-supported scheme of computer science, robotics and computational thinking. This paper will demonstrate how teachers have acted as gatekeepers to block a curriculum that they view as narrow, difficult to teach and in conflict with their beliefs and practices as educational professionals. Extensive qualitative data were collected through classroom observations, teacher and student interviews and student artifact creation in four state-maintained primary school classrooms to explore how teachers acted agentically to minimize or altogether reject a legally mandated curriculum that clashed with their local, professional knowledge. Analysis of this data was supported by official documents and personal accounts of the creation of the computing program of study, which highlight a discourse of economic anxiety and post-imperialist nostalgia on the part of the curriculum's designers. This study will illuminate the significant influence that teachers wield as gatekeepers for subject content, with the ability to reject digital technology curricula even when it is supported by industry and mandated by law. of educational technology policy or the integration of computing skills into a multi-subject curriculum.