1970
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/8.11.640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Resolution of Unresolved Convoluted Gas-Chromatographic Peaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within a factor, peaks are detected by using first and second derivatives to find local minima and maxima. All found peaks are then simultaneously fit to mathematically idealized forms; we assume a Gaussian curve as the ideal chromatographic peak shape (Anderson et al, 1970), though experimental peaks are often perturbed from the ideal shape by instrumental factors and a certain level of mixing of signals is introduced (Isaacman-VanWertz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Decision Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a factor, peaks are detected by using first and second derivatives to find local minima and maxima. All found peaks are then simultaneously fit to mathematically idealized forms; we assume a Gaussian curve as the ideal chromatographic peak shape (Anderson et al, 1970), though experimental peaks are often perturbed from the ideal shape by instrumental factors and a certain level of mixing of signals is introduced (Isaacman-VanWertz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Decision Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of methods of digital data analysis, Marson (625) and Metzger (647) treated a few methods of fused peak deconvolution and peak area reallocation. Computer resolution of unresolved peaks was shown to be enhanced by fast Fourier transform analysis of Gaussian ( 586) and asymmetrical peaks (641), the numerical method described by Goldberg (861), an iterative nonlinear regression analysis with a skewed Gaussian (24,26), an algebraic analysis of overlapping peaks (185), and the four parameter, skewed Gaussian method (425). Other workers have investigated more classical methods such as the perpendicular drop (708), and the derivative peak height ratio method ( 510).…”
Section: Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curve fitting is one of the most utilized techniques for the resolution of overlapped peaks, but reliable and accurate initial estimations of the number of peaks, their positions, shapes, and widths are necessary to find acceptable solutions. [18][19][20] Also, the resolving ability is limited by noise level. 21 One of the main drawbacks is that as the number of overlapping peaks increases, either small errors in the data (e.g., noise or baseline distortions), or errors in the mathematical model can be magnified, leading to large errors in the parameters of the final model 22,23 and to ambiguous fitting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%