1994
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/15.10.2281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer program for the analysis of mutational spectra: application to p53 mutations

Abstract: Mutations in the p53 oncogene are extremely common in human cancers, and environmental exposure to mutagenic agents may play a role in the frequency and nature of the mutations. Differences in the patterns of p53 mutations have been observed for different tumor types. It is not trivial to determine if the differences observed in two mutational spectra are statistically significant. To this end, we present a computer program for comparison of two mutational spectra. The program runs on IBM-compatible personal c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
138
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive responses are defined as those where the induced MF in one or more treated cultures exceeds the global evaluation factor (GEF) of 126 mutants per 10 6 cells and there is also a dose related increase with MF. LOH patterns of mutants were compared using the computer program (Cariello et al, 1994) for Monte Carlo analysis developed by Adams and Skopek (1987).…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive responses are defined as those where the induced MF in one or more treated cultures exceeds the global evaluation factor (GEF) of 126 mutants per 10 6 cells and there is also a dose related increase with MF. LOH patterns of mutants were compared using the computer program (Cariello et al, 1994) for Monte Carlo analysis developed by Adams and Skopek (1987).…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical comparisons of mutation spectra were carried out using the Monte Carlo approximation to Fisher's exact test of Adams and Skopek (1987), with 1700 iterations in a programme available on the web (Cariello et al, 1994) and the significance level set at 0.05. The test conducts pairwise comparisons using the 11 mutational classes shown in Figure 4B and Supplementary Table 2), including the subset of G:C to A:T mutations that occurred at CpG sites.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pfu=plaque forming unit; AVG=average; SD=standard deviation; ND=not determined without correction for clonality, with the result being that the total number of mutants rose from 81 to 131, the transitions went up to 90% (most of which are G:C?A:T transitions) and the percentage in the other categories went down (since all the clonal mutations are transitions). A Monte Carlo simulation of the hypergeometric test (Cariello et al, 1994) was performed on the two spectra, using the number of mutants of each category as input, and there was no significant difference between them (P=0.97). MSH6 (through MutSa) supports the repair of base mismatches, single nucleotide (nt) insertions/deletions and to a lesser extent larger IDLs in vitro, thus one would not expect to see larger IDLs reflected in the in vivo mutation spectrum of MSH6-deficient mice since MutSb is still present and is primarily involved in the repair of IDLs and, to a lesser degree, single base loops (Genschel et al, 1998).…”
Section: Mutation Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%