2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A current clinical application of Nashikkar in 60 subjects also shows the superiority of NAV. The deviation from the planning in the navigation group was 0.2° ± 4.8° and 1.4° ± 2.8° for version and inclination, respectively [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A current clinical application of Nashikkar in 60 subjects also shows the superiority of NAV. The deviation from the planning in the navigation group was 0.2° ± 4.8° and 1.4° ± 2.8° for version and inclination, respectively [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, prior studies have validated the accuracy of this guided technology, and thus, our findings are expected to appropriately predict final implant position. 25 Finally, this study did not evaluate subjective or objective clinical outcomes; therefore, we remain unable to fully assess the clinical benefit of intraoperative guidance on either patient-reported outcomes or implant survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… 17 Regardless of glenoid morphology, routine use of computer navigation may improve component positioning; Nashikkar et al found that postoperative alignment of glenoid components for patients undergoing aTSA and rTSA with computer navigation was within 5° of the plan for 82% of cases for version and 76% of cases for inclination. 25 The use of computer navigation or patient-specific guides in addition to preoperative planning may substantially improve the surgeons' accuracy when placing the glenoid component, especially in patients with severe posterior glenoid bone loss undergoing rTSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 Recent computer-assisted surgical techniques such as 3-dimensional planning software, patient-specific guides, and navigation systems have been developed for shoulder arthroplasty. 8 , 11 , 13 , 23 Previous studies have shown that the use of a navigation system reduces the average deviation of postoperative glenoid component positioning. 11 , 13 Similarly, our treatment of this patient involved accurate component placement using the navigation system as planned preoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%