2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0144-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Navigation Did Not Improve Alignment in a Lower-volume Total Knee Practice

Abstract: Postoperative alignment of the implanted prosthesis in computer-navigated TKA has been reported to be superior to that using the conventional technique. There is an assumption that use of computer navigation techniques can make an inexperienced or occasional TKA surgeon perform more like an expert TKA surgeon. To assess improved accuracy in recreation of mechanical alignment in TKA performed using computer navigation, a retrospective review of the experience of one of the authors (WPY) before and after using c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported inter-and intraobserver agreement in these measurements was strong to perfect [21]. Two of the authors (WPY, CHY) assessed the axial alignment of the lower limb and joint line obliquity in the digitalized standing radiographs of the whole lower limb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported inter-and intraobserver agreement in these measurements was strong to perfect [21]. Two of the authors (WPY, CHY) assessed the axial alignment of the lower limb and joint line obliquity in the digitalized standing radiographs of the whole lower limb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported patients who underwent navigated TKA had a lower risk of limb and implant malalignment at more than 3°with respect to the mechanical axis and an outlier rate of 12% to 13% for the limb mechanical axis. Despite the accuracy, individual studies have reported an outlier rate of 0% to 29% with navigated TKA for limb mechanical axis [16,17,24,28,29]. This wide variation may be due to the small number of navigated knees (ranging from 32 to 282) included in most of these studies and the fact that most of these cases were part of an early series where surgeon experience might have played a role in the alignment outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, none of these studies have analyzed the causes or risk factors for malalignment. Few [17,24,28] have attributed malalignment to reasons such as error during bone cuts, error during registration, displacement of the infrared arrays during the procedure, and errors that occur during obtaining and measuring postoperative radiographs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that computer navigation could be used as a teaching tool and result in superior results even for the occasional TKR surgeon [1,4,8]. In 2008, Yau et al, in a retrospective study, failed to show any improvement in postoperative alignment using a computer-assisted technique in a low volume knee practice [25]. In 2005, Daubresse et al hypothesised that the learning curve for a computer navigated TKR technique can not be any longer than that of the free-hand technique, even in a community hospital [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%