Minimally invasive surgery has been adapted to a wide variety of colorectal procedures. The first laparoscopic right colectomy was published by Jacobs et al in 1991 1 ; shortly after which Fowler performed the first laparoscopic left colectomy. Since these initial reports, several large studies found that the oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy were equivalent to open surgery and that patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy tended to have improved shortterm outcomes such as decreased blood loss, shorter length of stay, faster return of bowel function, fewer wound complications, and improved postoperative pain. 2-9 Despite the growing body of evidence supporting the use of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer, the adoption of the technique was relatively slow with the utilization of laparoscopic colectomy only reaching 41.6% in 2010. [10][11][12] Despite its advantages over open surgery, there are some limitations to minimally invasive surgery. Loss of binocular vision, paradoxical motion of the instruments, amplified movements, parallel instrumentation, poor ergonomics, 13,14 increased motion needed to accomplish a given task, 15 and loss of proprioception are all common limitations. To overcome some of these shortfalls, the use of hand-assisted laparoscopy was introduced. 16,17 Although studies have shown similar oncologic outcomes, the short-term outcome benefits of laparoscopy were lost with the hand-assisted technique. 18,19 Furthermore, the incisional hernia rate for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery has reported to be between 6 and 10.6%, 20,21 although this may be contingent on port site placement. 22 The da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) was developed to overcome the limitations of traditional laparoscopic surgery. This system provided several potential advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery including a stable camera platform, three-dimensional (3D) imaging, improved ergonomics, tremor elimination, ambidextrous capability, motion scaling, and instruments with multiple degrees of freedom. The first two robotic-assisted colectomies described in the literature were performed in 2001 by Weber et al. 23 Several studies have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy 24-33 and overall, robotic-assisted right colectomy had similar perioperative and oncologic outcomes at the expense of longer operation times, and increased surgical costs. Some studies suggest there may be some advantage to robotic right colectomy with regards to decreased estimated blood loss 25,26,30,31 and faster return of bowel function. [30][31][32] Although no significant benefit of robotic surgery has been seen, some authors feel that a robotic right colectomy is a good procedure for surgeons to tackle the learning curve of robotic surgery before undertaking more complex operations such as a low anterior resection, 24 while others liken the use of robotic surgery for right colectomy to taking a Ferrari to the grocery store to do the weekly shopping. 34 Left colect...