1974
DOI: 10.1364/ao.13.2762_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Generated Hologram; Null Lens Test of Aspheric Wavefronts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So the maximum slope of encoded wave-front is lower than that of conventional null-test methods [6][7][8] . This makes the HOEs fabrication easier.…”
Section: Feasibility Of Hoesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…So the maximum slope of encoded wave-front is lower than that of conventional null-test methods [6][7][8] . This makes the HOEs fabrication easier.…”
Section: Feasibility Of Hoesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The advantages of aspheric lens lie in their capability to improve the image quality and compact the optical system. Various techniques have been developed for aspheric testing [1][2][3][4]. The interferometric measurement as a populartechniquehas a big challenge to test the aspheric surface with large deviation from the best-fit-sphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this often requires not only the convex aspheric with homogeneity of materials but also expensive null optics. Recent studies showed that null lenses could be replaced with computer-generated holograms (CGHs) [3,4]. Since the CGH is nothing more than a ruling pattern, its errors take the form of spatial distortion in that pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%