2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.20.124801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer codes for beam dynamics analysis of cyclotronlike accelerators

Abstract: Computer codes suitable for the study of beam dynamics in cyclotronlike (classical and isochronous cyclotrons, synchrocyclotrons, and fixed field alternating gradient) accelerators are reviewed. Computer modeling of cyclotron segments, such as the central zone, acceleration region, and extraction system is considered. The author does not claim to give a full and detailed description of the methods and algorithms used in the codes. Special attention is paid to the codes already proven and confirmed at the exist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main objective is to provide reliable modeling tools for FFA type of accelerators and to better explain the results of the experiments at the KURNS 150 MeV scaling FFA [7]. There exist several simulation codes for FFAs [31]. However, only a few were part of this benchmarking analysis so far.…”
Section: Benchmarking Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective is to provide reliable modeling tools for FFA type of accelerators and to better explain the results of the experiments at the KURNS 150 MeV scaling FFA [7]. There exist several simulation codes for FFAs [31]. However, only a few were part of this benchmarking analysis so far.…”
Section: Benchmarking Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fig. 6 the smallest turn separation at RRI2 is 18 mm σ [1,16] = 6.4 mm, where the symbol σ [l,u] indicates a single objective for the turns l to u. Therefore, the deviation to the measurement is less than half a turn for the maximum absolute error.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). σ [106,148] σ [149,182] σ [1,16] σ [32,61] σ [62,105] σ [9,31] Figure 17. Evolution of the best individual during the multiobjective optimization.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations