The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-based recognition of dysmorphic faces

Abstract: Genetic syndromes often involve craniofacial malformations. We have investigated whether a computer can recognize disease-specific facial patterns in unrelated individuals. For this, 55 photographs (256 Â 256 pixel) of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type III (n ¼ 6), Cornelia de Lange (n ¼ 12), fragile X (n ¼ 12), Prader -Willi (n ¼ 12), and Williams-Beuren (n ¼ 13) syndromes were preprocessed by a Gabor wavelet transformation. By comparing the feature vectors at 32 facial nodes, 42/55 (76%) of the patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(14) reported on performing face classification using only texture analysis via Gabor wavelet transformations and various classifiers. The data sets consisted initially of 55 patients suffering from five genetic syndromes, and later of 147 patients suffering from ten genetic syndromes, achieving an overall classification accuracy of 76 and 75.7%, respectively (13,14). In a study published in 2008, Vollmar et al (15) included side-view photographs and geometric information in the face classification analyses, resulting in improved accuracy in an even larger data set (14 genetic syndromes).…”
Section: Application In Cs and Current Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(14) reported on performing face classification using only texture analysis via Gabor wavelet transformations and various classifiers. The data sets consisted initially of 55 patients suffering from five genetic syndromes, and later of 147 patients suffering from ten genetic syndromes, achieving an overall classification accuracy of 76 and 75.7%, respectively (13,14). In a study published in 2008, Vollmar et al (15) included side-view photographs and geometric information in the face classification analyses, resulting in improved accuracy in an even larger data set (14 genetic syndromes).…”
Section: Application In Cs and Current Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification based on 2D images of face shape alone achieved a recognition rate for fragile X syndrome between 75 and 99.9%, depending on the technique used. 22,23 The overall syndrome recognition rate of 10 different syndromes ranged between 52 and 76%, confirming that computer-based methods are able to recognize some syndromerelated facial characteristics better than others. Studies using DSMs of 3D face shape have delineated common facial features in a range of neurodevelopmental conditions, often, in addition, establishing accurate discriminating characteristics or assisting the determination of phenotype-genotype correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…16,25 Recently, the data format has been applied successfully to the classification of different syndromes, which influence the facial appearance, from static facial images. 5,10,12,15,18,21,23 To better interpret which kind of features are contained in the Gabor graphs and for inspection by the clinician, it is important to visualize Gabor graphs by reconstructing images from them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%