2012
DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2011.598668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-based instruction for improving student nurses’ general numeracy: is it effective? Two randomised trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of exposure ranged from 9.05 minutes to 9 months [83]. Most of the studies (51 out of 60, 85%) were conducted exclusively in high income countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The duration of exposure ranged from 9.05 minutes to 9 months [83]. Most of the studies (51 out of 60, 85%) were conducted exclusively in high income countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome measures for these studies were based on test items or questions [31, 70], written case analyses [41], MCQs [50,51,56,60,72,77], the Six–subgroup Quality Scale (SSQS) [52], a general numeracy test [83] and independent assessments by evaluators [79]. The sample size of these studies ranged from 39 to 1475.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in some nursing programs, attempts have been made to increase numeracy skills among nursing students through the introduction of computer-based or online mathematical learning software (Hodge, 2002), such as the well-known computer-based dosage calculation program, Authentic World, with mixed results in terms of effectiveness (Ainsworth et al, 2012;Hutton et al, 2010). A concerned group of Canadian nursing instructors from both the collaborative BScN program at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology and the practical nursing program at Durham College, formed a joint Math Committee to analyze the inadequacies in their nursing students' mathematics abilities and to plan for math competency development.…”
Section: Mathematics For Nursingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Glaister (2005) found that computerised learning was significantly more effective at transferring procedural knowledge than either integrative learning, or a combination of the two, although there were no significant differences between scores on other types of knowledge acquisition. However, following a review of two randomised controlled trials of the online learning programme "Authentic World', Ainsworth et al (2012) reported that use of this computer programme created a small negative effect on numeracy that was statistically significant in one of the trials. Another approach included the use of revision sessions (Hutton et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%